Republican party terrorism

“The Bush administration again scares the population with vague threats that terrorism is about to strike. Propaganda intended to keep people too scared to vote next week and continue public support for a bogged down failing war. Low voter turnout = republican advantage.”

“Spock's Profile--white male, 25-55 yrs old, few if any female relationships, marginal health, bouts of depression, unsatisfied with life overall, and likes to view pornography. It's possible that this individual still lives in his parent's home. May have experimented with gay sex or at least thought about it. He is frustrated and needs to vent. Warning, should be considered dangerous.”

“add:

Phallicly challenged.

Likes to pull wings off butterflies and kill insects with a magnifying glass.

Wears tin foil hats whenever outside to prevent Bush's mind control beams from reaching him. Removed all metal fillings from his teeth for same reason.

Plays country music songs backwards to uncover republican subliminal messages.”

“S=stupid P=person O=on C=crack K=kernals”

“Don't forget..... avid reader of "The Catcher in the Rye"”

“He prolly likes to wiggel his feengers in stinky mewl butt hiney holes to I gess.”

“Who is scared? I feel kinda motivated. I wish a terrorist would show up in my backyard. Most Americans are the snivelling cowards that Spock sees us as.”

“Spock is right you know. I just hope that your more inteligent than your coments here.”

“Oops, I meant 'are not.' Sorry guys.”

“Thinair is also thin on grey matter! Geeez, another paranoid loser/troll to put up with. Oh well.... the price of an unmoderated board, I suppose.”

“Not Paranoid, not a loser, just educated and able to see Spock's insight.”

“boutique anti-americanism does not equal insight.”

“LOL to the max.”

“It gives me great pleasure to see the NeoClintonites squirm.

Feel the burn, bay-bee!”

“Neo means new. So a NeoClintonite is a new Clintonite? Are there old Clintonites? Do they squirm too? ;)”

“...whatever.

Feel it!”

“And Clinton has what to do with this, gojo? Spock strikes me as more the Naderista type...”

“naderista! LOL!!!!”

“Do you think he's a NeoNaderista? :)”

“I ate a naderista for lunch. The hot sauce was a little mild though.”

“I get jock itch on my naderistas sometimes.”

“closet naderista?

reformed naderista?”

“Bush = fear monger”

“If you can't debate, just be an ass and insult like a redneck moron.

As for bacpac, I'm going to refer to you from now on as "Spock's Little Helper". You are helping me so much lately. ;-)”

“May I ask you Max, what of Spock's coment is Anti-American? Anti-Republican YES Refreshing YES! Anti-American NO.
Patriotic YES”

“I think Spock should get a little helper named Xanax.”

“Spock, thinair, tom terrific, solitary hiker, gear slut - what a crowd, what a sorry mislead crowd. I actually pity you people.”

“LOL! Your list seams to be growing Buddha.”

“Let's just keep it simple . Buddha is an idiot.”

“It is clear why Buddha Bear is the President of the HMWH Club.

He can spot a phoney from across the internet.”

“hey! tom is a swell guy!”

“I note that nothing has changed around here. "I disagree with your opinion so you suck." My pity is reserved not for those I disagree with, but for those who are so incredibly self-delusional.”

“The good thing about Spock is that we don't miss kleety.”

“WASHINGTON (Oct. 30, 2001)-- The FBI is warning again that terrorists may attack U.S. interests, possibly this week, and that Americans and police should be on the highest alert. Members of Osama bin Laden's network could be plotting attacks in retaliation for the American-led bombing of Afghanistan, officials said.
Attorney General John Ashcroft said the warning -- the second this month -- was based on credible information, described by others as coming from intelligence sources, that terrorists could strike within the United States or against U.S. intelligence sources. The information did not specify the type of attack or targets, Ashcroft said.

As on Oct. 11, when the FBI issued a similar warning, Ashcroft tried to walk a fine line between giving the public prompt and necessary warnings and not causing panic.

The alert "gives people a basis for continuing to live their lives the way they would otherwise live them, with this elevated sense of alertness or vigilance," Ashcroft told a news conference.

Without giving specifics, the Bush administration is pandering to Osama by terrorizing the citizens of the USA. Bush provides no evidence of what the threat specifically is. Bush has provided no evidence that Osama was responsible for the WTC, only providing evidence of involvement from previous embassy and USS COLE attacks. Bush knows that Osama has been attackingthe USA on average less than once a year, and that Osama will not attack again soon by prefering to play the victim. Bush is using the situation to bolster himself by claiming attacks are likely, and when they predicatbly don't happen, he claims that the warnings thwarted the attack. The US needs leadership, Bush gives us politics as usual.”

“WASHINGTON (Oct. 30, 2001)-- The FBI is warning again that terrorists may attack U.S. interests, possibly this week, and that Americans and police should be on the highest alert. Members of Osama bin Laden's network could be plotting attacks in retaliation for the American-led bombing of Afghanistan, officials said.
Attorney General John Ashcroft said the warning -- the second this month -- was based on credible information, described by others as coming from intelligence sources, that terrorists could strike within the United States or against U.S. intelligence sources. The information did not specify the type of attack or targets, Ashcroft said.

As on Oct. 11, when the FBI issued a similar warning, Ashcroft tried to walk a fine line between giving the public prompt and necessary warnings and not causing panic.

The alert "gives people a basis for continuing to live their lives the way they would otherwise live them, with this elevated sense of alertness or vigilance," Ashcroft told a news conference.

Without giving specifics, the Bush administration is pandering to Osama by terrorizing the citizens of the USA. Bush provides no evidence of what the threat specifically is. Bush has provided no evidence that Osama was responsible for the WTC, only providing evidence of involvement from previous embassy and USS COLE attacks. Bush knows that Osama has been attackingthe USA on average less than once a year, and that Osama will not attack again soon by prefering to play the victim. Bush is using the situation to bolster himself by claiming attacks are likely, and when they predictably don't happen, he claims that the warnings thwarted the attack. The US needs leadership, Bush gives us politics as usual.”

“do you think you will ever grow up?”

“What's your piont?”

“Squirm ya worms!

GAWD - I LOVE THIS!

Heheheheheheheeeeeeeeeeee!

God Bless America!
...and our Great Leader!”

“CYBER SPACE (Oct. 30, 2001)-- The FBI is warning again that
Spock may troll more bull sh$t, possibly this week, and that
Trail Talkers should be on the highest alert. Spock could be plotting posting in
retaliation for mockery of his miniscule dick size.
Attorney General John Ashcroft said the warning -- the second
this month -- was based on credible information, described by
others as coming from intelligence sources, that Spock could
post on Trail Talk with no apparent aims or intelligence.
The information did not specify the type of posts or
subjects, Ashcroft said.

As on Oct. 11, when the FBI issued a similar warning, Ashcroft
tried to walk a fine line between giving trail talkers prompt and
necessary warnings so as not to cause to many people to fall out of their
chairs ROTFLTAO at such an idiot.

The alert "gives trail talkers a basis for continuing to live their lives
the way they would otherwise live them, with this elevated sense
of alertness or vigilance," Ashcroft told a news conference.

Without giving specifics, Spock is pandering
by trolling the citizens of the Trail Talk. Spock provides no
real evidence of intelligence. Spock has provided no
evidence that he is even human, only
providing evidence of the ability to type and post drivel.
Trail Talkers know that Spock has been trolling daily and that
Spock will troll again soon, even after his admission on the "JUMP" thread
that no American woman would give the time of day and he had to import his trim from
Asia (which also serve as evidence of his miniscule dick size)
Spock will likely use this post to bolster himself by claiming that personal attacks
are the work of the Israelis, and when they predictably happen, he whines
about the lack maturity even though he has started numerous infantile threads such
as "Mrs. Radagast" and "Republican Extremists".”

“High five, BaSO4.”

“I have no respect for either camp in these 'dicussions' anymore.

"George Bush is a terrorist."

"George Bush is God."

How about "George Bush is a politician, no more, no less"?

And the qulity of the reply might be a reference to someone's genetalia. wow. The quality of the 'debate' is difficult to distinguish for all the muck. I can see why you people debate politics on a backpacking board. You'd be ripped into tiny pieces anywhere else.”

“"George Bush is showing them that those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't."”

“Wow Tilt, you've really taken to this new title you've given yourself as the TT Behavior Modification Police, haven't you? You're gonna drag us dunderheads up to your level even if you have to drag us kicking and screaming. LOL! Who's holier than thou now? Do you think you might have been a ruler wielding nun in a past life? Where is your live and let live attitude you demanded of me? I guess people of faith don't have the market cornered on hypocrisy, ey?





Now if ya'all will excuse me, I'm going hiking! 8)”

“Did I devolve to calling someone a NAME?

Nope.

I described what I saw.”

“Please attempt to respond to the point, if possible.

If not, feel free to make comments about the person making the point (which would make MY point for me).”

“I dunno, guys. I just don't understand it. 'Places' like this hold so much promise for people to learn from each other, but it seems that it winds up like This all too often. This place is not at all unique.

I'm still thinking about the 'Controversial Subjects' thread.

How did Trail Talk get this way? (that's a rhetorical question!! LOL) People should be able to discuss anyhing under the sun without having it turn into a fight. I mean, we're all adults here, or nearly so! What's the point of it? No one will ever get 'the last word.'

What does this say about us? What kind of example does this set?

It seems such a waste.”

“Tilt, you can never have an intellegent debate with trolls like spock around, whose only goal is to incite anger. I have tried to engage spock in an intellegent discussion on a couple of occassions, but he refused to respond. If Matt were to moderate this board and boot out the trolls, things would improve dramatically.

You didn't find BaS04's parody even a little funny? I thought it was hilarious, and about what spock deserved, particularly after his venemous attacks on certain folks and there spouses.”

“You're right that it's pointless to try to engage trolls, but why sink to their level? It only feeds their pathology.”

“Agreed. I am trying to improve in that regard my own darn self.”

“God Bless George W. Bush!”