![]() |
Welcome to thebackpacker.com create account login |
![]() |
Cut and paste h@llView MessagesViewing posts 1 to 29 of 29 messages posted.
Cut and paste h@ll “So here we are. TTers hammering out the finer points of foreign policy.... Everyone loves a good cut/paste once in a while.At best when carefully used they can be the final hammer-blow in debate(if winning is what you are after...more on that later).At worst they are irritatingly long. I love to read but if I wanted a 20 paragraph persuasive essay on any given subject,I would seek out the source. IMHO it would seem that if "WE" are trying to express opinions, and even trying to persuade others it may be better to formulate our own ideas and not just quote people ad nauseum. As we all know a source to support any insane issue can be quote for pages thanks to the internet. But ultimately it just a bunch of words that arent even created by those who support the writers. I personally am rarely persuaded by these tactics. I am sure many others would agree. I would rather hear an individual articulate there own beliefs without depending on some proffesor from East Newark University of Progessive Thought or a staff writer from The West Ballsac Times to speak for them. Cut/Pastes are great when it comes to discussion revolving around the FACTS of an issue. For example the weight of a pair of womens size 10 Zamberlan Civettas. But in a debate about more emotionally charged and less tangible subjects ( like "this war is a sham") there is no clear black and white. Or more appropriattely your black is my white and vice-versa. Persuasion wont come from beating one to death with a cut and paste (even though its funner than all get out). Persuasion comes from respecting another person enough to respect their opinion (fat chance at TT). In short (hehehe) stop being intellectually lazy. Speak your mind, blow off some steam but for the sake of all that is good and righteous LAY OFF THE FRIGGIN' CUT AND PASTES ALREADY!!!!. This now concludes my rant. See, you actually can write paragraph after paragraph of gibberish on your own without a single cut/paste. Try it, its the new thing.” 8:16:15 PM 11/03/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “I agree!!! One or two paragraphs is OK, but those long and drawn out articles are useless (I mean, I never read them...who has the time to?) However, Mr.birch, your post is almost as long as some of dem cut & pasters ;)” 8:47:00 PM 11/03/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “I agree wiff Birch again! If ya must show us the whole text... post a link.” 8:54:06 PM 11/03/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Cut and pasteth the raven: >>Nevermore” 9:02:05 PM 11/03/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “The only one who could really post a looooooong post with style was Orbitmanifesto. Where's he been?” 9:15:25 PM 11/03/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Orbit who? Is he realted to Obi wan by any chance?” 9:41:11 PM 11/03/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “HOW DARE YOU BIRCH! How dare you chastise the cut and pasters that grace our presence here at TT. Not everyone can have their own original idea and defend it, or debate it. We need to let these "special" people be, and allow them thier freedom of cutting and pasting. If we don't, they may actually try to come up with an original thought of thier own, and thier brains will melt down. If you want thier blood on your hands Birch, so be it. I cannot be a part of this cruelty. Damn the man, let them paste.” 11:27:23 PM 11/03/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “LOL BB. I agree with Birch. Some time ago , I believe her name was Nancy Tuchon, had quite a debate going on. I think it was about animal rights. All she ever did on that thread was cut and paste, or quote others. I was lurking on that thread. I did post finally and asked her to give her thoughts. She had posted some compelling thoughts and arguments, but they truly lacked conviction. I asked her to give her thoughts, tell how she lived her life according to what she was cutting and pasting, etc. She never did , and I was left with the conclusion that she really had nothing to say. I was also left with the conclusion that she could jump on a band wagon. Pedxing has a good idea, post a link. Just give us your thoughts here, it is you that is posting here.....” 7:39:34 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Txwoodswoman, Orbit was/is a dude who used to post here all the time. He was known for his outrageously long posts. Look up a thread about "mountain bike dui" for a sample.” 8:06:59 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “The West Ballsac Times? Do they have a web page?” 8:12:04 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Here's something for the Bush apologists to read while you non-reading crybabies whine about me cutting and pasting. Bush Blocks All Public Access To White House Papers By Sarah Left The Guardian 11-2-1 The US president, George Bush, last night signed an executive order that allows either a past or sitting president to block access to White House papers, a move that has angered historians, journalists and former president Bill Clinton. The order amends - and some argue, reverses - a 1978 law that allowed journalists, historians and other interested parties to read presidential papers twelve years after the term of office finished. The law, known as the Presidential Records Act, was the result of a lengthy legal battle over the papers of Watergate president Richard Nixon. Under the terms of Mr Bush's order, any sitting or former president could veto the release of presidential papers. The current president could not override a former president's veto, nor could a former president override the decision of sitting president. Anyone seeking access to the papers could appeal the veto in court, but that would necessitate an expensive and potentially lengthy legal challenge. The immediate provocation for last night's order is believed to be an outstanding request for 68,000 pages of former president Ronald Reagan's papers, which should have been opened to public scrutiny in January. The Bush administration has delayed that release three times, and yesterday White House counsel Alberto Gonzales would not say when or if the Reagan documents will be placed in the public domain. Some historians have voiced suspicions that the Bush administration is worried about what the Reagan papers might reveal about officials now working for Mr Bush. They include the secretary of state, Colin Powell, the budget director, Mitch Daniels Jr, and the White House chief of staff, Andrew Card. The White House defended the order as establishing a procedure for implementing the 1978 Act. A White House official said: "History has shown that former presidents release virtually all of their documents and this executive order won't stand in the way of that." However the order would also mean that Mr Bush's personal papers detailing the decision-making process in the current war on terrorism could remain secret in perpetuity. Bruce Craig, the director of the National Coordinating Committee for the Promotion of History, called the order "blatantly unlawful top to bottom" and predicted a quick legal challenge. "This is about confidential information - communication between a president and top people - that they would simply prefer not to be released to the public," he said. Vanderbilt University historian Hugh Graham said the draft was a "real monster," and complained, "They [the administration] would reverse an act of Congress with an executive order." According to a report in the Washington Post, a lawyer for Mr Clinton wrote to the White House objecting to the order. The paper quotes an aide to Mr Clinton as saying, "A government's legitimacy is based on the trust of its people, and when decisions are made on behalf of the American people, citizens eventually have to be able to see the process of how those decisions came to be." Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001 Link” 8:27:01 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “What is a Bush apologist? I don't think there are any. Doesn't there have to be something to apologize for in the first place?” 8:54:57 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “How about for his being a dumb @ss? I'm just glad he has some smart people around him.” 8:59:38 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “A dumb ass as compared to who? He has a degree from Yale. An MBA from Harvard. He flew fighter jets in the National Guard. No apology necessary.” 9:06:58 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “One of my personal favorite copy/pastes: George W. Bush, Albert Einstein and Pablo Picasso all die. Due to a glitch in the mundane/celestial time-space continuum, all three arrive at the Pearly Gates more or less simultaneously, even though their deaths have taken place decades apart. The first to present himself to Saint Peter is Einstein. Saint Peter questions him. "You look like Einstein, but you have NO idea the lengths certain people will go to, to sneak into Heaven under false pretenses. Can you prove who you really are?" Einstein ponders for a few seconds and asks, "Could I have a blackboard and some chalk?" Saint Peter complies with a snap of his fingers. The blackboard and chalk instantly appear. Einstein proceeds to describe with arcane mathematics and symbols his special theory of relativity. Saint Peter is suitably impressed. "You really *are Einstein! Welcome to heaven!" The next to arrive is Picasso. Once again Saint Peter asks for his credentials. Picasso doesn't hesitate. "Mind if I use that blackboard and chalk?" Saint Peter says, "Go ahead," Picasso erases Einstein's scribbles and proceeds to sketch out a truly stunning mural. Bulls, satyrs, nude women: he captures their essences with but a few strokes of the chalk. Saint Peter claps. "Surely you are the great artist you claim to be! Come on in!" The last to arrive is George W. Bush. Saint Peter scratches his head. "Einstein and Picasso both managed to prove their identity. How can you prove yours?" George W. looks bewildered, "Who are Einstein and Picasso?" Saint Peter sighs, "Come on in, George."” 9:16:52 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “These quotes "Mexico is our biggest trading partner" "England is our closest friend" both required apologies to countries which were given by Powell because Bush didn't have the nads or the brains to know any better.” 9:20:34 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “SH if you must cut and paste: paste the essential paragraphs.... do a little active editing.” 10:30:29 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Why did he have to apologize for "England is our closest friend"? That's true, isn't it? Sorry, Canadians. I don't have a problem with Bush. He's a nice, well-intended man. I just think that we had two really bad choices the last time around. And why are we apologizing to other countries? We have the right to defend our own borders. If other countries don't like that, too bad. The problem, of course, is that the Bush administration turned its back on the world before this incident. So now that the initial shock of the attack is over, the other countries are starting to turn a cold shoulder to Bush. The war will be won in American security procedures. Sure glad it only took a month and a half for Bush to push through a partisan airline security bill.” 10:49:05 AM 11/04/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “
vlink="#FFCC00" fontsize=medium>fontsize=medium>
To learn to smallify quoted text, click href="#qte" selected>here
What Cut, Copy and Paste is Good ForIf you're writing a letter or post, you will frequently want to be able to include material from the original within your response. While this can be done by Forwarding or Attaching the entire original message, by copying text from the original instead you can insert your comments before, between, and after parts of the original text (which can be indented and "smallified," giving the appearance of quoted-text edit?see href="#qte">below).
The Four Cmd'sThere are four basic Cmd key combinations you'll be using when you cut/copy/paste text. Here they are, along with what they do:
In addition, when you're writing something yourself, you can highlight from the cursor position "up" or "down" within the material you're typing/editing by holding the Shift key and pressing an Arrow key.
Learning to Use Cut, Copy, PasteTry it out. Right now, place your cursor in the form below (it's probably already there) and press Cmd-A to highlight all the text within the text window. Then press Cmd-X to cut it; then Cmd-V to paste it back again?then Cmd-V again, to paste a second copy into the same window.
How to "Fake" Quoted-Text Edit with C/C/P
For a different approach to smallification, check out Don Rogers's page, How
11:02:20 AM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Is there a server that your post works on?” 11:35:54 AM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Hack, Hack” 11:38:24 AM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “no, ped. this is the junk that will work on nothing, as opposed to his normal posts that only screw up in 85% of the browsers used.” 11:46:53 AM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “No it doesn't work well Ped and was only posted as a humorous response to birch's rant which, by the way, I totally agree with. It only pissed of raddy as a bonus.” 12:51:50 PM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “it doesn't piss me off. i just don't understand why you post stuff that most folks can't see. i'm sure that matt loves it, tho.” 12:57:13 PM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “It was beautiful Violin, blunt but subtle at the same time. A much less offensive way to say "Cease and desist in all of that cut and pasting sh!t!"” 1:21:00 PM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Oh.. I have to have ORIGINAL ideas? hMmmm.. could be difficult.. cut and paste is so much easier.. I mean.. why invent new things.. just recycle everyone elses! *scampers away*” 1:28:17 PM 11/05/01 WTF? “Hell Yeah Man.” 1:30:41 PM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “I cant see the letters on this thread, there is not enough contrast.” 3:47:22 PM 11/05/01 RE: Cut and paste h@ll “Oh yah, regurgitation so simple, an infant could do it.” 3:50:19 PM 11/05/01
Post a MessageIn order to post a response to this thread you must first be logged in. If you do not already have an account, you must first create a new account.
|
SearchReady to Buy Gear?Sponsored Links
Great Outdoor SitesLinks |