 |
Welcome to thebackpacker.com create account login |
 |
Simer, you jerk!View Messagesnot funny............ “So are you the new Violin??” 10:04:12 PM 2/10/03 OK, yeah I clicked on it.... “The "Moo" thread. DON'T.” 10:04:59 PM 2/10/03 “Hey, if you have good firewall software, it can't hurt ya...;-)” 11:44:06 PM 2/10/03 “Didn't hurt. Just totally locked up Internet Explorer. I can't help but think Matt won't appreciate that. I mean, maybe it was a mistake... hopefully..... Don't want to think you have to risk that with every new thread you say on TT!” 11:51:30 PM 2/10/03 “Worked fine for me. What archaic piece of #&%!$ are you running there lizs? I don’t know if matt can disable that little trick without banning all HTML so it would probably be best not to use that one again simer.” 5:46:48 AM 2/11/03 “Actually, don't blame simer, it was PedXing. He forgot to close the tag and hosed the whole thread. I've thought for a long time that matt should just ban that guy.” 6:03:43 AM 2/11/03 “Just so you know, it was both those ninnies.” 6:38:51 AM 2/11/03 “Hmmm, well OK. Sorry Simer. It just totally locked up IE and that, of course, didn't make me happy. lol... I manage to do that enough on my own without someone else doing it for me.” 6:38:54 AM 2/11/03 “oh yeah, and I clicked on the thread when there was only one post on it. So I have no clue how PedXing ties in and... hmmm, well I am on the iMac now. Shall we see if it can screw the iMac up?? LOL!” 6:40:48 AM 2/11/03 “oh yeah, and I clicked on the thread when there was only one post on it. So I have no clue how PedXing ties in and... hmmm, well I am on the iMac now. Shall we see if it can screw the iMac up?? LOL! OH GOODIE!! MATT ZAPPED IT!!! yeah!” 6:41:36 AM 2/11/03 “Hey what's the deal with the pop-up box that just says "Boo"?” 6:43:54 AM 2/11/03 “You couldn't see pedninny's post because everything after his message wouldn't display (including the field for new posts).” 8:29:37 AM 2/11/03 “Look at it this way, Simer... You Got Your Name In A Thread Title! congratulations, and all that rot.” 8:32:31 AM 2/11/03 “lol, am i a celebrity now? I didn't mean any harm by it - i really didn't try to mess it all up. sorry do i get a prize?” 8:34:04 AM 2/11/03 “Violin's just jealous that he didn't do it!” 8:34:59 AM 2/11/03 “Just so you know, it was both those ninnies." matt, the webmaster 06:38:51 AM 02/11/03 am I the only one thats blown away by Matt calling someone a ninnie” 8:45:55 AM 2/11/03 “If the shoe fits...” 9:01:24 AM 2/11/03 “Are you all bored or what?” 9:33:14 AM 2/11/03 ninnies “Simer and I both deserved it.” 9:38:58 AM 2/11/03 “lol i'm a ninnie” 9:40:08 AM 2/11/03 “You know, when I get mad at someone I usually like to call them "neurotic little pissmires" or other simularly creative names.” 9:41:29 AM 2/11/03 “not me I say "YOU $%#$ING MORON DUMBASS" makes me feel better!” 9:42:41 AM 2/11/03 “well not all of us are pottymouths! :P” 9:44:53 AM 2/11/03 “Q: Why does mapleleaf's employer have to keep re-wallpapering her office? A: It keeps spontaneously peeling off the wall for some reason...” 9:46:55 AM 2/11/03 “LOL if they built me the window that i wanted, i could just open it up and shout it out for the world to hear :)” 9:48:25 AM 2/11/03 “...and open your employer up to even further liability? I think not...lol.....” 9:56:21 AM 2/11/03 10:02:54 AM 2/11/03 “BAN SIMER!!!” 9:05:51 AM 2/12/03 “LMFAO @ stove” 9:18:00 AM 2/12/03 “I am writing on behalf of myself and a few of my friends to state that until recently, Simer's subliminal psywar campaigns have gone unnoticed and unanalyzed. I would like to start by discussing Simer's remarks, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Let's all keep our fingers crossed that he doesn't preach a propaganda of hate. Other than that, he should not put political correctness ahead of scientific rigor. Not now, not ever. I indubitably hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Simer does any real damage. Or is it already too late? A complete answer to that question would take more space than I can afford, so I'll have to give you a simplified answer. For starters, ever since Simer decided to pigeonhole people into predetermined categories, his consistent, unvarying line has been that the best way to serve one's country is to reward mediocrity. His hypocrisy has reached a new low. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true. Whether or not Simer should oppose the visceral views of 98 percent of the nation's citizens ought to be a simple question, far beyond the realm of debate. However, there is no place in this country where we are safe from his janissaries, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. Are you prepared to discuss this, Simer? I could tell him that this is a fine example of what I've been talking about, although he obviously doesn't care. I could tell him that history teaches us that to ignore or dismiss people like Simer simply as satanic devotees of conspiracy theories can have devastating consequences, but he wouldn't believe me. Simer probably also doesn't care that Simer disguises his iron fist with a velvet glove. So let me appeal to whatever small semblance of reason Simer may be capable of when I tell him that you might say, "If his assistants are frightened that he might hammer a few more nails into the coffin of freedom by next weekend, they have only themselves to blame." Fine, I agree. But I don't care what others say about him. He's still tasteless, belligerent, and he intends to empty the meaning of such concepts as "self," "justice," "freedom," and other profundities. All of this once again proves the old saying that I am inwardly repelled by the pettifogging phraseology of Simer's words and the nerdy, foul-mouthed style in which they are expressed.” 9:45:41 AM 2/12/03 “huh?” 9:54:31 AM 2/12/03 “wtf is that suppposed to mean? lol who exactly was that speach written for, i don't think it quite fits my circumstance, lol” 9:55:37 AM 2/12/03 “Oh I think you know exactly what I'm talking about. Lol. Don't make me expose everthing about the evil known as simer190.” 10:01:06 AM 2/12/03 “there can't be too much evil known of me, i don't think” 10:04:15 AM 2/12/03 “Here's the angry letter Simer knew he was bound to receive. I begin with critical semantic clarifications. First, Simer has stated that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. One clear inference from that statement -- an inference that is never really disavowed -- is that we ought to worship the worst kinds of bad-tempered misers there are as folk heroes. Now that's just hateful. While it is reasonable to expect that he definitely needs to come to terms with his lame-brained past, it remains that he is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens his creature comforts, he throws principle to the wind. Simer's wisecracks are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? That's the question that perplexes me the most, because in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, Simer not only lies, but he brags about his lying to his thralls. While there are many slatternly ex-cons, Simer is the most incoherent of the lot. The reason he wants to substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence is that he's entirely evil. If you believe you have another explanation for his unsavory, disagreeable behavior, then please write and tell me about it. The point at which you discover that he is bound to have a rude awakening when he finally realizes how few people approve of his bookish communications is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that his cat's-paws are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Simer, who wants nothing less than to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills. Yes, Virginia, my current plan is to give peace a chance. Yes, Simer will draw upon the most powerful fires of Hell to tear that plan asunder, but he could use a heavy dose of sensitivity training. To cap that off, that's just one side of the coin. The other side is that he and his comrades are, by nature, harebrained slobs. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but Simer likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why I once managed to get him to agree that he simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, crotchety dialectic. Unfortunately, a few minutes later, he did a volte-face and denied that he had ever said that. If I may be permitted to make an observation, Simer is immovably entrenched in his deceitful philosophical positions. End of story. Actually, I should add that he thinks that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. However, he still labors under the outmoded pretense that the only way to expand one's mind is with drugs -- or maybe even chocolate. Nevertheless, if I hear his factotums say, "The rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters" one more time, I'm going to throw up. This is well illustrated in what remains one of the most divisive issues of our day: snobbism. We must convince the government to clamp down hard on Simer's views. We must uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to force Simer into early retirement. And we must reveal the nature and activity of Simer's grunts and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. Please join me in incorporating these words into our living credo.” 10:05:09 AM 2/12/03 “I reiterate.... huh?” 10:09:13 AM 2/12/03 “I reiterate... wtf?” 10:10:06 AM 2/12/03 “i think he just said i am the master of all tters and you must all listen to what i say” 10:11:08 AM 2/12/03 “It is not likely that I shall say anything new here. If I do, it will be of only minor significance. Nevertheless, the pressures and stresses that Simer's sycophants undergo lead them to create a regime of heinous credentialism. To start, Simer prefers to see problems talked to death instead of solved. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. Why does he want to engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts? Because thanks to Simer, I'm now suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome. That's not the only reason, of course, but I'll get to the other reasons later. He keeps saying that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. For some reason, Simer's associates actually believe this nonsense. It seems that no one else is telling you that bettering the world is apparently the last item on his "to do" list. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, Simer thinks we want him to borrow money and spend it on programs that acquire power and use it to indoctrinate hypocritical astrologers. Excuse me, but maybe he insists that anyone who resists him deserves to be crushed. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Simer's memoirs serve no purpose other than to condition the public -- or, more precisely, brainwash the public -- into believing that Simer never engages in sexist, despicable, or crapulous politics. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to protect our peace, privacy, and safety. At this point, all I can do is repeat a line from my previous letter: "The theoretical fallacies in his jeremiads run deep". There is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of raucous freaks of nature, but the hope that makes you eager to strike at the heart of his efforts to let us know exactly what our attitudes should be towards various types of people and behavior. By and large, it's ludicrous to believe that law and order can be maintained by letting Simer's cult followers trick academics into abandoning the principles of scientific inquiry. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to Simer. Simer's generalizations appeal to people who are fearful about the world's political and economic situation and long for simple solutions to complex problems. And that's all I have to say.” 10:13:05 AM 2/12/03 “this one's for you violin: Thank you! We're all refreshed and challenged by your unique point of view, you ridiculous little carnival freak. You should offer your posting style to hospital operating theatres as a highly-effective alternative to unconsciousness-inducing medications. If your brain matter was axle grease, there wouldn't be enough in your head to grease the dynamo on a lightening bug's ass. Wouldn't clues have more room to fit in your head if you got rid of some of the gobbledygook in there? A long period of non-posting would be most welcome on your part. You bring to mind a quote from Josh Billing: "Doesn't know much, but leads the league in nostril hair." If that post was intended as a joke, you forgot to include the punch line. You are like watching Amputee Field Hockey: pathetic, and very quickly disgusting. Maybe you wouldn't read like such a pathetic loser if you'd had enough oxygen at birth; if your weren't so fat that when you stand on the Speaking Scale, it screams, or if you didn't have a face that makes Medusa look like a supermodel. No, come to think of it, you would. In closing, why don't you put your glasses on backwards and walk into yourself?” 10:15:46 AM 2/12/03 Say 'uncle'. “In this post, I would like to share with you some thoughts I originally organized to tell Simer what we all think of him -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use. The following paragraphs are intended as an initial, open-ended sketch of how bad the current situation is. A word to the wise: You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with pusillanimous, superstitious psychopaths?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that I want nothing more -- or less -- than to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different sorts of horny propagandism. To that task I have consecrated my life, and I invite you to do likewise. Simer should hide his head in shame before the judgment of future generations, whose tongue it will no longer be possible to stop and which, therefore, will say what today all of us know to be true: Simer maintains that either the best way to serve one's country is to perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other fastidious, besotted ne'er-do-wells' intentions or that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders". Simer denies any other possibility. Don't give his expedients a credibility they don't deserve. Despite what he says, I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Simer's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. We must reach out to people with the message that I find Simer the most illaudable person in the world. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage. It should be clear by this point that his antics all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. Simer's lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of overgeneralizations. Others are in the form of opinions. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. Simer's practices are complete and total offal. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if he didn't, you might come to realize that he may ridicule, parody, censor, and downgrade opposing ideas right after he reads this letter. Let him. Within a short period of time, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, will stop the Huns at the gate. Simer is not just rude; he's confused, too. He has never tried to stop disruptive malcontents who dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. In fact, quite the opposite is true: Simer encourages that sort of behavior. Was he just trying to be cute when he said that his obiter dicta are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals? I sure hope so, because there are some possession-obsessed slaves to fashion who are unenlightened. There are also some who are mumpish. Which category does Simer fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". He is too tasteless to reason with. But let's not lose perspective. In public, he vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, he never fails to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Too many emotions to count raced through my mind when I first realized that Simer wants nothing less than to impale us on the pike of racism. His proxies then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with snivelling geeks who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that Simer's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Simer is more adept at hidden mind control and his techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. It's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of ageism-prone tyrants like him can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. Simer's wheelings and dealings serve as a stepping stone to world government. And who will compose that world government? A ruling class consisting of complacent crooks. If natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species, then Simer is clearly going to be the first to go. Isn't it true that the nicest thing that can be said about his cohorts is that they are self-deceiving wastrels out to exploit the masses? If that's not true, tell me why not. A more fundamental problem is that what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that his faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. Simer is not as psychotic or unambitious as you might think. He's more so. Before explaining why sexist misers cause insurmountable trouble for us, I must first lead us all toward a better, brighter future. I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival. While some information provided by Simer's intimates may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or unsavory sentiments. It goes without saying that prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially Simer's puerile form of it -- is. You've never heard that Simer's intention is to produce nothing but filth? That's because his surrogates have been staging a massive cover-up for quite some time now. But if you keep your eyes open, you'll notice that he wants us to feel sorry for the officious big-mouths who set up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carry out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, feel we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that Simer likes to compare his declamations to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. There are rumors circulating that his belief systems are steeped in cynical, amoral fascism, so let me just clarify something: A person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her publications. Simer has never had that faculty. He always does what he wants to do at the moment and figures he'll be able to lie himself out of any problems that arise. He claims that every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information. That claim is preposterous and, to use Simer's own language, overtly bookish. No history can justify it. In order to begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action, tremendous sacrifices and equally great labors will sincerely be necessary. And I can say that with a clear conscience, because Simer's screeds will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. If Simer wants to make contentious extremists out to be something they're not, let him wear the opprobrium of that decision. If you read his writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that villainous perverts and abusive, militant airheads should rule this country. But if you read Simer's writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that he somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights), distortions (all any child needs is a big dose of television every day), and misplaced idealism (he knows 100% of everything 100% of the time). However, when I try to respond in kind, I get censored faster than you can say "photodisintegration". I want to keep this brief: Simer's recommendations are priggism cloaked in the rhetoric of blathering anti-intellectualism. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. Simer says that society is screaming for his fairy tales. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life. If anything, he ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably: Fact: We all have an obligation to stand up together and forcefully oppose his power-hungry, appalling rejoinders. Fact: It's really hard to take someone as unrestrained as Simer very seriously. Fact: Simer's functionaries have the temerity to create division in the name of diversity and then say that everyone else should do the same. In addition, Simer's jibes always follow the same pattern. He puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. One can examine this from another angle, and plainly see that given the amount of misinformation that Simer is circulating, I must point out that those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to enable all people to achieve their potential as human beings have no right to complain when he and his secret police reward those who knowingly or unknowingly play along with his maneuvers while punishing those who oppose them. We must reinforce what is best in people. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that Simer's catch-phrases are like an enormous fanaticism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must work together towards a shared vision, because even Simer's devotees are afraid that Simer will present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about his press releases one day. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that Simer's peevish jeremiads can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. Social stability and family unity are two things that insincere rakes have no concern for. That is why, come what may, we must delegitimize Simer.” 10:21:56 AM 2/12/03 “I feel that it is my duty to expose HTML Terrorist TrollMeister Violin's objectives for what they really are. In the first place, someone has been giving Violin's brain a very thorough washing, and now Violin is trying to do the same to us. What he does in private is none of my business. But when Violin tries to pigeonhole people into predetermined categories, I object. I'll let you in on a little secret: the commercialism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, apolaustic attack on progressive ideas. Of perhaps even more concern is that he extricates himself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice. Let's be realistic: once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Violin, however, is more likely to cater to the basest instincts of possession-obsessed low-lifes. This is not the place to develop that subject. It demands many pages of analysis, which I can't spare in this letter. Instead, I'll just state the key point, which is that in order to solve the big problems with him, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad. In spite of the fact that due to circumstances that I have encountered in my research, I find that I must burn away social illness, exploitation, and human suffering, if he gets his way, none of us will be able to hinder the power of wishy-washy heretics like Violin. Therefore, we must not let him pull the levers of authoritarianism and oil the gears of chauvinism. If his grunts had even an ounce of integrity, they would get the facts out in the hope that somebody else will do something to solve the problem. Violin has a natural talent for complaining. He can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours. My point may be made clearer by use of an allegorical tale. Suppose a hypothetical group of three people is standing in a room. One of those people realizes that by balancing the theoretical untruth and nonsense of Violin's outbursts with the reality of this phenomenon, we can see that Violin's stratagems have grown into the world's greatest enslavers of human minds. Another goes on and on about Violin's militant tracts. But the third can't understand why it is difficult for many people to accept that I'm not going to respond to Violin's double standards beyond saying that Violin can't relate what he sees to any broader principle. In this hypothetical situation, it should be obvious that the world would be better off if Violin had never been born. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: In view of Violin's inimical criticisms, what does it make sense for us to do now? A clue might be that Violin is trying to sacrifice children on the twin altars of pharisaism and greed. His mission? To distract people from serious analysis of the situation. And there you have it. I don't expect everyone to agree with me.” 10:24:26 AM 2/12/03 “what was that about "an enormous fanaticism-spewing machine"? LOL!” 10:24:36 AM 2/12/03 “I love "find - replace"... LOL!” 10:24:59 AM 2/12/03 “Was that a "world's smallest violin" joke?” 10:26:11 AM 2/12/03 “Half of me was reluctant to write this letter, out of concern that Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator may be one of those organizations who do vicious things for the sole purpose of gaining attention. But given Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's track record, I have concluded that its crusades make many mainstream wimps nervous, so I've decided to proceed. One of my objectives is to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. I realize that pharisaism is a tremendous problem in our society, but does it constantly have to be thrown in our faces? To ask that question another way, has Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator ever considered what would happen if a small fraction of its time spent trying to wreck our country, derail our civilization, and threaten the human race with extinction was instead spent on something productive? To ask that question another way, where is its integrity? Well, we all know the answer to that question, don't we? But in case you don't, then you should note that today, we might have let it lionize unrestrained exhibitionists. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will place blame where it belongs -- in the hands of Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator and its meretricious trained seals. If it were up to Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. Is this anything other than incompetent careerism? The answer is obvious if you happen to notice that I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of diatribes. Others are in the form of stances. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. I'm not saying this to be lackluster, but rather to explain that as our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the kinds of people Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator preys upon. Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's argument that it is its moral imperative to toy with our opinions is hopelessly flawed and utterly circuitous. One of Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's former allies, shortly after having escaped from Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's iron veil of monolithic thought, stated, "Many new recruits of Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator's movement have come across a bridge of feudalism." This comment is typical of those who have finally realized that if Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. In the end, I, not being one of the many ruthless yobbos of this world, am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke Scott Pakin's automatic complaint-letter generator to wage an odd sort of warfare upon a largely unprepared and unrecognizing public.” 10:38:37 AM 2/12/03 “While you're probably sick of hearing about Some Idiotic Complaint Generator, it is crucial that you read this post. First, the misinformation: Some Idiotic Complaint Generator suggests that it is a paragon of morality and wisdom. Where the heck did it come up with that? The answer is not obvious, because if you think that its opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality -- then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what Some Idiotic Complaint Generator wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance. You may not be aware of this, but Some Idiotic Complaint Generator has never gotten ahead because of its hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of Some Idiotic Complaint Generator's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. If one believes statements like, "Some Idiotic Complaint Generator is the one who will lead us to our great shining future," one is, in effect, supporting what I call two-faced scumbags. Some Idiotic Complaint Generator does not merely take a condescending cheap shot at a person that most deranged sociopaths will never be in a position to condescend to. It does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. Currently, Some Idiotic Complaint Generator's plans for the future merely recruit and encourage young people to procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror, just as older drug dealers use young kids to push drugs. As you will see before long, this is only the tip of a gigantic iceberg. Often, the lure of an articulate new pundit, a well-financed attention-getting program, an effective audience generator, hot new "inside" information, or a professionally produced exposé is irresistible to stubborn, socially inept ingrates who want to sidetrack us, so we can't make a genuine contribution to human society. Some Idiotic Complaint Generator ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. If there's a rule, and Some Idiotic Complaint Generator keeps making exceptions to that rule, then what good is the rule? I mean, I am thoroughly shocked and angered by Some Idiotic Complaint Generator's delusional improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that if you've never seen Some Idiotic Complaint Generator expose and neutralize its enemies rather than sit at the same table and negotiate, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. If you've read this far, then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. I repeat: One could truthfully say that Some Idiotic Complaint Generator's attempts to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality are just a game to it. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. Some Idiotic Complaint Generator keeps saying that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. For some reason, Some Idiotic Complaint Generator's forces actually believe this nonsense. Some Idiotic Complaint Generator expresses only the noblest intentions, singing praises to the value of community even as it enacts policies that take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want Some Idiotic Complaint Generator to impose a narrow theological agenda on secular society, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while Some Idiotic Complaint Generator claims that the worst kinds of demonic, crafty cutthroats there are make the best scout leaders and schoolteachers. After having read this, you may think that I must, on principle, fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Some Idiotic Complaint Generator's editorials have become. Nevertheless, you should always remember that the moral devastations that accompany Some Idiotic Complaint Generator's shiftless, malodorous ploys suffice to slowly but surely perpetuate the myth that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues.” 10:45:07 AM 2/12/03 “I'm lost...” 10:53:43 AM 2/12/03 “LOL! The Viol man and I had the same idea. You can find the automatic complaint generator on google.” 12:12:08 PM 2/12/03 “Yo simer! You have mail!! :D” 2:26:00 PM 11/16/05
Post a MessageIn order to post a response to this thread you must first be logged in. If you do not already have an account, you must first create a new account.
|
SearchReady to Buy Gear?Sponsored Links
Great Outdoor SitesLinks |
