CNN, MSNBC, FOXNEWS

“Do the Bug!!”

“It amuses me how many people think this place is a pit, yet they keep posting here.”

“You just think they think its a pit.”

“You just think I think they think its a pit”

“I just love the "my news is best stories".

It is borderline hilarious.”

“none of them are best, but some are the worst (that would be a tie for worst since I said some)”

“Interesting interview with Lou Dobbs on Jon Stewart.

http://rawstory.com/2009/11/stewart-dobbs-abhorrent-and-wrong/”

“Racism is a line of crackers waiting for Quitzit`s autograph.”

“ClimateGate Totally Ignored By TV News Outlets Except Fox


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/11/24/climategate-totally-ignored-tv-news-outlets-except-fox”

“LOL....

http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/fox-projected-to-win-november-sweeps-for-first-time.html

Fox to win November sweeps....

ABC to fight back with

http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/abc-announces-oprah-obama-christmas-special.html”

“thanks for the nightmares, mississippi”

“http://www.businessinsider.com/anderson-cooper-ratings-2009-12



Bet they are missing Lou Dobbs right about now...”

“Not his paycheck they aren`t. Look before leaping.”

“Not having viewers is great for their bottom line.”

“CALLED IT!

http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/12/02/cnn-missing-dobbs/

After Dobbs announced his resignation on air on Wednesday November 11, CNN suffered a 25% decline among all viewers in Dobbs` 7pm time slot, and a 26% decline among adults 25-54.”

“Shocking! Dobbs viewers left when he did!

Are you a soothsayer in your off hours?”

“hehe, nobody filled his shoes

also, Cooper's ratings dropped, but he didn't leave”

“Sweet Lou should run for president on the "Talk-Show Hosts Make Good Executives" platform.”

“Well, that would be more that Obama has going for him.”

“I just remember all you progresso-libs yucking it up the day he resigned.”

“http://www.mediaite.com/tv/100-cnn-reaches-historic-low-in-prime-time-demo/

LOL.

CNN has reached a historic ratings low during prime time in the A25-54 demographic, finishing as the fourth place cable news network in that category now 100 times during 2009. This means CNN finished behind Fox News, MSNBC and sister network HLN.

While CNN’s daytime line-up has seen far more success – generally finishing in 2nd place behind just FNC – their prime time line-up has not yet turned around.
This is by far the most times this has ever happened for CNN. The network has now finished in 4th place in that category 41% of 2009 weeknights. It’s a dramatic fall from 2008, when Anderson Cooper’s 10pmET hour actually won the prime time demo, even topping his FNC competition. 2008 of course was a very big year for CNN, as the presidential election dominated coverage. But while CNN’s prime time ratings have not dropped off significantly from 2007 and before, the competition is growing enormously, and leaving CNN behind in the category.”

“This one seems really important to you guys.

Tell you what... we'll let you keep the cable news ratings trophy and we'll keep the White House, Senate and House.

Its probably the safest arrangement for everyone. Your guys suck at governance but absolutely rock when it comes to creating propaganda for morons.”

“so what good are your boys doing in the white house?

how's that out of control spending you blamed bush for?

how's that war thing you blamed bush for?

how's that gdp thing?

the guantanimo thing?

the global warming treaty thing?

the africa thing?

the job thing?

the muslims attacking in the usa thing?

the borders thing?

the hunger thing?

the high gas cost thing?

what else did you blame bush for?


How's all that working out for ya?
last edited: 12/07/09 3:59:18 PM”

“Ahh, another math "error" from your friends at Faux. They shore got some GEEEEN-YUS-SUS over there...

”

“Um Rosey they included all 57 states that the Bamster visited.”

“http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/americans_skeptical_of_science_behind_global_warming

You shore are a GEEEEEN-YUS.

4th paragraph”

“It really would be too much to ask Faux to do their own math.”

“all percents do not have to add to 100

made up example:

85% of tters enjoy hiking the mountains
25% of tters enjoy hiking icy mountains
25% of tters enjoy hiking deserts”

“but those aren`t mutually exclusive options, are they? One can enjoy hiking deserts AND icy mountains. Can a person think that scientists are simultaneously highly likely and not very likely to have falsified evidence? Does that make sense to you? Are you actually defending this misinformation?”

“i noticed you skipped the option of having somewhat likely and very likely

I am somewhat likely to think you did that on purpose.
Come to think of it, I am very likely to think you did that on purpose.

Both true.”

“So, what youre saying is that some people lied and answered twice. I expected as much.

From the article you posted:

Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Americans say its at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data to support their own theories and beliefs about global warming. Thirty-five percent (35%) say its Very Likely. Just 26% say its not very or not at all likely that some scientists falsified data. ”

“they didn't have to answer twice if therecwere multiple questions

are you guys trolling?

are you guys thinking of trolling?

are you guys kidding?

are you guys serious?

are you guys statistically ignorant?

are you guys hungry?”

“you may have answered:

yes
yes
no
no
yes
yes”

“I wonder, would you defend this level of misinformation or outright dishonesty if it didn`t support your delusion of new world order conspiracy? Something tells me you`d be singing a whole different song there, sarge”

“i doubt you'd be attacking it - what is your point?”

“loose argument, attack poster
- pepsi

got it”

“What? Obviously youre back to your old ways for the sake of goading.

Your lame example had many different questions. There was just ONE question asked in the poll. You cannot be both very certain and somewhat certain when asked a question. You are either one way, or the other.

Or maybe youre just thick (in the mental dept)...”

“loose argument, attack poster
- rosey

got it”

“Your argument makes NO sense, Sarge.

Actually, you started the personal attacks, Sargie.”

“"loose" argument?

got it.

I prefer tight arguments, myself. It`s always hilarious when Sarge attempts to feign some sort of superiority while he has the spelling and grammar of a slow third-grader
last edited: 12/08/09 3:40:25 PM”

“nevertheless - you loose”

“yup, there goes that credibility again. better luck tomorrow”

“at least I won”

“At any rate, scientists falsified documents and anyone with a brain knows that modern science left the realm of objectivity years ago. Everyone of us whether we are on the left or the right or in the middle have pointed at a one or more scientific studies and called them bunk.”

“The moonbats are running scared. LOL

Rosey likes his science to come from political types or lawyers.”

“LOL...Sorry libbies.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/32039.html


Fox is the most trusted television news network in the country, according to a new poll out Tuesday.


A Public Policy Polling nationwide survey of 1,151 registered voters Jan. 18-19 found that 49 percent of Americans trusted Fox News, 10 percentage points more than any other network.


Thirty-seven percent said they didn’t trust Fox, also the lowest level of distrust that any of the networks recorded.


There was a strong partisan split among those who said they trusted Fox — with 74 percent of Republicans saying they trusted the network, while only 30 percent of Democrats said they did.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/32039.html#ixzz0dosFuYKu”