![]() |
Welcome to thebackpacker.com create account login |
![]() |
The ultimate digital probeView MessagesViewing posts 1 to 5 of 5 messages posted.
its about cameras stupid! “Don't be digusting . . . . that is not what I meant! I know much about digital cameras has been covered in other threads. I searched, read and followed some links. My SLR (Minolta 400si) has died. It will be a minimum of $160 to send it out. A new body is $200 and will be compatable with my two lenses (35-70mm and 70-210mm) BEFORE I drop $200 on a new body for the SLR, I want to explore digital. Here are my specific criteria: 1. I want a good optical zoom feature. I used my 210 zoom as much as I used the 50mm. My understanding is, to get into the 210 area optically, you need at least a 6x optical zoom 2. I want relatively small size (it would be nice to shed the weight of the extra lenses and large camera) 3. I want simplicity!! I do not use ¼ of the features on my current SLR. I would likely never use the "video" or "voice" features available on some of the digitals. I have a ton of other questions to ask, but I'll start here: Bottom line: recommendations for a simple, digital with 6x or better optical zoom. OH . . .and price . . .I looked at the Nikon 5700 . . .$1,000 will be tooooo much!!! Thanks in advance!” 9:43:31 AM 3/20/03 “Lee, you will have a problem getting a digital camera with a great zoom. (they would cost way over $1000). Olympus has a couple out that have a 10x optical zoom. I think sony has one too, but that thing is huge! Check this site http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusc700uz/ It's only 2 megapixel tho. When I tried to buy my digital I was looking at great zoom too, so that's why I know a little bit about it. I may have missed some tho.” 10:45:26 AM 3/20/03 10:56:14 AM 3/20/03 Okay, I admit this title is tempting... “...especially after Sarabelle's comment about butt werms, and my subsequent 'regression.' Butt, I will resist! ;-}” 11:58:30 AM 3/20/03 “Thanks Fritz -- I had picked that referal up in one of the other threads. It looks like the least expense for the biggest lens. I also had asked Pennsy what he was shooting with . . .his Nikon 5700 is prolly to rich for my blood! Thanks for the link to the Fuji!” 1:08:56 PM 3/20/03
Post a MessageIn order to post a response to this thread you must first be logged in. If you do not already have an account, you must first create a new account.
|
SearchReady to Buy Gear?Sponsored Links
Great Outdoor SitesLinks |