![]() |
Welcome to thebackpacker.com create account login |
![]() |
Bush making America safer in the futureView MessagesViewing posts 751 to 800 of 818 messages posted.
Jump to Page << prev   | 1   | 2   | 3   | 4   | 5   | 6   | 7   | 8   | 9   | 10   | 11   | 12   | 13   | 14   | 15   |  16 | 17   |  next >> “No once again I am pointing out the Hilarious Hypocracy of the left...when Clinton lied (we will be home from Bosnia in a Year) he was covered the whole way. When he lied (he later admitted to PERJURY which is a violation of the Executive Oath) he was given a pass...but you admit Bush never actually lied...but your silly hypocracy allows you to claim he lied even when he didnt' but Clinton never lied even when he was disbarred for it.” 2:11:07 PM 9/27/06 “Pointed out the hypoicracy of the left when it comes to the lies of the right. Thank you once again XL. At least you have some backbone and accountability, unlike those in the Administration.” 3:44:27 PM 9/27/06 “XL - That WMD stuff is trivial traces consistent with what the UN inspectors and WMD skeptics anounced in the lead up to the war: All Iraq had left was degraded left over stuff that posed no significant threat. The stuff was mostly left over fromt he days when Rummy and company were helping Saddam fight Iran. And yeah Bush and company hyped the WMD threat big time.” 4:12:12 PM 9/27/06 “I still think we ought to nuke someone.” 4:15:15 PM 9/27/06 “Right... they released an NIE that redacted all the reservations the intelligence community had about Iraqi WMD’s. Can you imagine what was in the parts of this NIE that he wouldn't declassify if the part he did release was so damning?” 4:17:06 PM 9/27/06 “Damnit! I said nuke em!” 4:19:07 PM 9/27/06 “Some blasts from the past with the Bush and company: I reccomend reading this complete radion address, but here is a highlight GW Bush: "The danger to our country is grave and it is growing. The Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons, is rebuilding the facilities to make more and, according to the British government, could launch a biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the order is given. The regime has long-standing and continuing ties to terrorist groups, and there are al Qaeda terrorists inside Iraq. This regime is seeking a nuclear bomb, and with fissile material could build one within a year." http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020928.html also: Rumsfeld 9/19/02: [Saddam has] amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of biological weapons, including Anthrax, botulism, toxins and possibly smallpox. He's amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of chemical weapons, including VX, Sarin and mustard gas. http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2002/s20020919-secdef2.html Cheney, 8/26/02: Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt that he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us. Cheney, 8/26/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/08/20020826.html "Some have argued that the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent - that Saddam is at least 5-7 years away from having nuclear weapons. I would not be so certain. And we should be just as concerned about the immediate threat from biological weapons. Iraq has these weapons." Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 9/18/02 "The threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction will be removed." Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 3/25/03 "This is about imminent threat." White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 2/10/03 "Saddam Hussein possesses chemical and biological weapons. Iraq poses a threat to the security of our people and to the stability of the world that is distinct from any other. It's a danger to its neighbors, to the United States, to the Middle East and to the international peace and stability. It's a danger we cannot ignore. Iraq and North Korea are both repressive dictatorships to be sure and both pose threats. But Iraq is unique. In both word and deed, Iraq has demonstrated that it is seeking the means to strike the United States and our friends and allies with weapons of mass destruction." Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 1/20/03 "No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world than the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq." Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, 9/19/02” last edited: 9/27/06 4:25:30 PM” 4:24:06 PM 9/27/06 “ah.... The Classics. One of my all-time favorites is Cheney's baseless pre-invasion assertion that Bush et al. knew RIGHT where the WMD's were ---- they just needed to go get 'em! oops.” 5:17:31 PM 9/27/06 “How did that whole Plame crap work out for you, Tilt? oops.” 6:09:24 PM 9/27/06 “There goes Stovey - playing the Plame game again.” 7:28:42 PM 9/27/06 “It's a new Classic. I will use it forever.” 7:32:15 PM 9/27/06 1:31:27 PM 9/28/06 “Now you are aware he HAD WMDs, He HAD USED WMDs and we have FOUND them. Not in the sapacity of say Redstone Arsenal, but enough to kill a couple hundred thousand Americans....” XL400236 9:10:24 AM 9/27/06 Are you talking about what has been found in the last five years? If so, your reign of error continues.” 8:11:28 PM 9/28/06 “Olberman is a Democrat Hack. A true joke, only hard core libs could stand. ![]() last edited: 9/28/06 8:38:22 PM” 8:37:24 PM 9/28/06 “that girl is hot” 9:48:20 PM 9/28/06 Oliver Stone “The director of blockbusters such as "Platoon," and "JFK" said the U.S. reaction to the attacks was out of proportion. "If there had been a better sense of preparation, if we had a leadership that was more mature," he said. "We did not fight back in the same way that the British fought the IRA or the Spanish government fought the Basques here. Terrorism is a manageable action. It can be lived with," said Stone. Says a lot about libbies mindset and their true reaction to terrorism.” 9:32:19 AM 9/29/06 “I love it when the limousine liberals want to give advice. They are all knowing and really should be listened to by those who have spent their whole adult lives in the military.” 9:34:52 AM 9/29/06 “You're talking about George W., right? He fits the definition of a limousine liberal. That whole "nu-kyou-ler" thing is a charade. He's just like his daddy. Big government for everyone.” 9:45:10 AM 9/29/06 “LOL...RL You are back! Great. Lets go through history again. During the Bush Fighter days he flew an F102 which at that time was a tactical intercept...(meaning it shot down enemy aircraft) now there was no call for that specific skill need in Vietnam (kinda like there were few Navy Torpeado aircraft used in Germany during the Second World War). However, the F-102 did have a unique role incase of incoming nukes from Cuba or the south. The Interceptor Pilot was ordered to "eliminate" the missile. The only way this would happen is by direct impact...you fly into the missile. Now by contrast John "I have a Hat" Kerry who was well on his way to winning 30 medals or at least forging his way to them, got out early and then lied in a Senate Panel while in uniform. Then there is your hero. Bill Clinton...want to review his history?” 1:07:52 PM 9/29/06 “The size of government is still growing at an unprecedented rate. And the generals in Iraq still need more troops. Who gives a #&%!$ about Vietnam?” 4:38:44 PM 9/29/06 “"Then there is your hero. Bill Clinton...want to review his history?" Bill Clinton should have been convicted in the Senate. He abused the power of the office.” 5:00:14 PM 9/29/06 Hey moonglo “ ![]() http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/ Here's the address for each day's cartoon. last edited: 9/29/06 5:20:26 PM” 5:20:02 PM 9/29/06 “Bush condemns N. Korea claim of nuclear tests; calls for 'immediate response' WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Speaking from the White House, President Bush on Monday called North Korea's claim of a nuclear test "a provocative act" and said the United States is working to confirm that such a test was carried out. Nothing more provocative than an unprovoked attack on Iraq, and then comparing Iraq to North Korea (and Iran). Bush's policies have firmly established the need for every country on the planet to pursue the nuclear deterrence to Bush's cowboy diplomacy.” 9:50:31 PM 10/09/06 “Nothing more provocative than an unprovoked attack on Iraq Actually, Iraq did attack not only us first (in the no fly zone), but they attacked their neighbors first. So your misconception that it was unprovoked is kind silly and makes my tummy feel like a fuzzy bunny.” 10:38:25 PM 10/09/06 5:53:39 AM 10/10/06 “USA would have preferred we only attack if Saddam was killing American military personel? Otherwise, let them die helplessly? Wow, that's rough man. Very cold hearted!” 5:56:22 AM 10/10/06 “Excuses, excuses...............” 6:48:12 AM 10/10/06 “"Excuses"!? LMAO! The mind of a relativist...” 6:58:47 AM 10/10/06 “We should have taken care of Kim before Sodamn.” 7:10:17 AM 10/10/06 “Hmmmm, the mind of one who believes in mythology! LMMFAO!! “We should have taken care of Kim before Sodamn.” Cujo 7:10:17 AM 10/10/06 "WE" You mean "they".” 7:19:13 AM 10/10/06 “We should have taken care of Kim...hmm like sending a failed spineless ex president and pathetic naval officer to grovel in front of him so we could work a deal with his buddies (CHICOMS) to sell high tech equipment so that the missiles would reach the United State...YEAH THAT PLAN WORKED> LOL...we could have TAKEN CARE of North Korea but another Democrat dampened his shorts in the 1950's and stopped. We could have taken CARE of the CHICOMS...but we refused to follow through.” 7:23:07 AM 10/10/06 “No, I mean like we should have militarily taken care of NK.” 7:27:15 AM 10/10/06 “Sorry Cujo, but just to the north are the CHICOMS. To take care of them we will truly risk nuclear war. Remember, due to past wierdness we have Taiwan and Japan to think about. The best way we could take care of NK is to convince the Chinese to do it for us.” 7:29:09 AM 10/10/06 “North Korea is a problem for China, South Korea and Japan. "No, I mean like we should have militarily taken care of NK." Exactly, "them"......the military, of which you ain't a part.” 7:34:34 AM 10/10/06 “MARK! Dingy Harry Reid has a suggestion...he wants us to negotiate with them (LOL)...heck when he was in power they did the most despicable thing they did...Bill "The Bent" sent Madeline Albright to speak to the Gargoyle like he was a real head of an equal nation. As for military, see you need to understand the military is not like a trained puppy. If you want to SEND them...you must be willing to accept everything that goes along with SENDING them. You sir, are not willing to accept or understand the end result.” 7:37:47 AM 10/10/06 “I disagree, FuegoFox. While China certainly would've tried to supply NK, they weren't really in a position back then to to risk open conflict with us, particularly with an international coalition behind us. But I agree with you now - that NK is China's problem. And Russia's.” 7:38:13 AM 10/10/06 “"But I agree with you now - that NK is China's problem. And Russia's." Well, ya got something right. China does not want a nukular-armed North Korea next door any more than they wanted a U.S. and U.K. armed force on their border in 1950.” 7:41:16 AM 10/10/06 “Cujo, China has always been more of a Trotsky style Communisim becuase they saw a buffer around them. The have the Ocean, Himalayas, South East Asia and more or less Russia as their real accessible borders. NK represents the one place that they could feel threatened. In 1951 they responded becuase they felt threatened. Remember that almost ALL invasions (outside that is) of China came through Korea.” 7:42:30 AM 10/10/06 “You have a good point, FeugoFox (were you known by a different handle in the past?). I'm basing my opinion on the fact that back in '02-'03, the 9/11 momentum was behind us, there was demonstrable evidence of "evildoing" by Kim, China was still trying to earn respect in international trade and such, and that China's military wasn't as modernized as it is becoming now. last edited: 10/10/06 7:48:30 AM” 7:47:46 AM 10/10/06 “China and NK are in cahoots.” 7:49:26 AM 10/10/06 “China does not want a nukular-armed North Korea next door - Mark I think they're much more upset that they're less able to use NK as leverage against the US.” 7:49:43 AM 10/10/06 “Cujo...its Halloween...I will go back to my other handle shortly. Mark is slightly right, I would not want an unstable dictator with Nukes next door to us....(Think Castro and CUBER) While the Gargoyle is a nut job he is safe as long as we can control him. Think Noriega he was a valuable pawn in the war in Nicaragua but when he became more and more involved in the Drug trade (Agent Camerana comes to mind) he had to go. I think in the end the Chinese will take out Kim when he loses his use (heck Socialist always have had a way to get rid of those who are a liability).” 7:54:08 AM 10/10/06 “he is safe as long as we can control him. We haven't been able to control is exportation of missile technology to terrorist harboring regimes... I think in the end the Chinese will take out Kim when he loses his use It appears Kim may be much less useful now. Time will tell.” 7:58:07 AM 10/10/06 “Let China and the UN deal with it.” 8:00:07 AM 10/10/06 “Warfare is the Way of deception.” 8:16:34 AM 10/10/06 “Now I see where NK is threatening to launch a Nuke Missile...until the 42nd administration it would not have reached off the Korean Penninsula...But thanks to Loral Aerospace and some well placed Buyouts of Billy the Bent....now you guys on the LEFT coast can get to wonder....” 8:26:39 AM 10/10/06 “Let 'em luanch. What will they hit? Kalifornia? We'll turn South Korea into an island.” 8:31:00 AM 10/10/06 “You have a good point, FeugoFox (were you known by a different handle in the past?). Username: Cujo State of residence: Missouri Member since: 10/2/06 might ask you the same thing unless your a troll!” 9:13:00 AM 10/10/06 “Oops, I thought I put "Mutt" in my user information.” 9:19:57 AM 10/10/06 “No need for that, Mutt. Your maddog conservative bombast makes it obvious. ”9:25:05 AM 10/10/06 Jump to Page << prev  
| 1  
| 2  
| 3  
| 4  
| 5  
| 6  
| 7  
| 8  
| 9  
| 10  
| 11  
| 12  
| 13  
| 14  
| 15  
|  16 | 17  
|  next >>
Post a MessageIn order to post a response to this thread you must first be logged in. If you do not already have an account, you must first create a new account.
|
SearchReady to Buy Gear?Sponsored Links
Great Outdoor SitesLinks |