Today's Useless Thread

“How useless is the usefulness offered by useless users?”

“uselessness is usefull only when used usually by a unison of the unuseful, is my thought.”

“.. but what if a small portion of those deemed useful are in fact only a larger portion of those majority who are indeed un-useful?”

“How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?”

“Woodchucks can't chuck wood thus the addage of how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood is subserviant to the notion of how many woodchucks would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck was sporting wood.”

“Why is it OK to prick your finger, but no OK to finger your prick?”

“Nurse! I told you to PRICK his BOIL, not......”

“A wood chuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood.”

“i feel so ......used”

“And as usual, the nurse fingered the prick in her usual manner. The prick reacted as people usually do when they are fingured. Pricks can finger a nurse in a most unusual way. Prick-finguring nurses more often than not, unusally, tho not always in the normal why, seem to enjoy this usefullness of prick finguring. Is this an unusual use of a fingering-prick? Even fingered pricks can fell used beyond the usual demand.-----Hope I did OK said the fingering prick in his usual manner.”

“I take a stuffed toy woodchuck with me on all my hikes. I strap him onto my pack and he bounces as I walk. I got "swooped" by a hawk once. Seems the bird of prey liked the way the stuffed toy bounced too :)”