is Ann Coulter

“So StoveStomper... You think saying horrible things about women who have lost their husbands is great?”

“Don't worry Ewker. You'll grow out of that crush you have on Ol' Hill. ;-)”

“I await your apology Violin.”

“Please explain how I lied Sarge, and why you are attempting to make this about me.

Coulter said something pretty aweful. Right thinking people of faith shouldn't defend her.”

“"Is Ann Coulter pretty?"
She isn't bad to look at, but like the Dixie Chicks, I think it would be best if she just shut the #&%!$ up.”

“A word to the wise......
Do NOT do a unrestricted Google Image search on 'dem girl'. LOL
The results will burn your eyes out and get you fired from work.
Good thing I'm at home today.”

“Please explain how I lied Sarge, and why you are attempting to make this about me.

I requoted you and showed you a link that proves you lied. Read my post. Tell me what you don't understand.

The only think I'm making about you is that you lied to me in response to my question. Nobody else lied, so I'm not going to place that blame on anybody but you. Would you prefer I blame your neighbor for lying? That would be silly. YOU lied, so I said as much.”

“I just can't believe a fine upstanding TTer like the vile man would lie about anything to make a political point, Sarge.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL”

“LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

And I can't believe he'd THEN deny it StoveStomer!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL”

“Violin - Ann criticized the women who were making political statements about this (among other things). Then you said They (and their children) most definately don't enjoy the fact that their husbands (or daddies) were murdered. So I asked you if they were publically debating this, and your answer to me was "No."

A simple google search revealed that they most certainly are very much involved in public debate on this matter, so either (a) you lied, or (b) you don't know what you're talking about.

Which is it?”

“Cute Sarge.

I answered "no" to your assertion that "she wasn't talking about all 9/11 victims."

But you knew that.”

“Colter puts the 'unt' in kunt.”

“Ann's attack on these widows was tasteless and sure to garner more sympathy for the widows's message than for Ann's.
I quite agree that this group of widows ALSO engaged in tasteless attacks in which they exploited their husbands' deaths, but outdoing them in the tasteless department is not a politically effective response.”

“Not sure how I would have known that Violin based on the flow of conversation. I guess I should know when you're dodging a question.
last edited: 6/07/06 12:57:39 PM”

“"...and sure to garner more sympathy for the widows's message than for Ann's."

Only from saps.”

“Ann has a new book out! Who could have guessed??? LOL
She normally throws a few bombs to get attention and you Libbies are playing right into her hands. LOL



Coulter Does NYT a Favor; Reviews Own Book
by Ann Coulter
Posted Jun 07, 2006


The long-anticipated book Godless: The Church of Liberalism was finally released this week. If the New York Times reviews it at all, they'll only talk about the Ann Coulter action-figure doll, so I think I'll write my own review.

Godless begins with a murder at the Louvre and then takes readers on a roller-coaster ride through the Church of Liberalism in a desperate game of cat and mouse in which the hunter becomes the hunted -- with a twist at the end you simply won't believe! It's a real page-turner -- even the book-on-tape version and large-print edition! Who knew a book about politics could make such an ideal gift -- especially with Father's Day just two weeks away!

The main problem with Godless is that I had to walk through the valley of darkness to find it. You will have to push past surly bookstore clerks, proceed past the weird people in the "self-help" section, and finally past the stacks and stacks of Hillary Clinton's memoirs. If all else fails, ask for the "hate speech" section of your local bookstore. Ironically, if you find Godless without asking for assistance, it's considered a minor miracle.

This is not a book about liberals. I stress this in anticipation of Alan Colmes hectoring the author to name names. (For people who resented being asked to "name names" during the 1950s, these liberals sure aren't shy about demanding that conservatives do the same today.)

It is a book about liberalism, our official state religion. Liberalism is a doctrine with a specific set of tenets that can be discussed, just like other religions.

The Christian religion, for example, frowns on lying and premarital sex. That is simply a fact about Christianity. This does not mean no Christian has ever lied or had premarital sex. Indeed, some Christians have committed murder, adultery, thievery, gluttony. That does not mean there's no such thing as Christianity any more than videotape of Rep. William Jefferson accepting cash bribes means there's no such thing as congressional ethics rules.

Similarly, the liberal religion supports abortion, but that doesn't mean every single liberal has had an abortion. We can rejoice that liberals do not always practice their religion.

Godless examines a set of beliefs known as "liberalism." It is the doctrine that prompts otherwise seemingly sane people to propose teaching children how to masturbate, allowing gays to marry, releasing murderers from prison, and teaching children that they share a common ancestor with the earthworm. (They haven't yet found the common ancestor ... but like O.J., the search continues.)

The demand that their religion be discussed only with reference to specific individuals -- who is godless? are you saying I'm godless? -- is simply an attempt to prevent us from talking about their religion. This tactic didn't work with Slander or Treason, and it's not going to work now.

It's not just that liberals ban Reform rabbis from saying brief prayers at high school graduations and swoop down on courthouses and town squares across America to cart off Ten Commandments monuments. The liberal hostility to God-based religions has already been copiously documented by many others. Godless goes far beyond this well-established liberal hostility to real religions.

The thesis of Godless is: Liberalism IS a religion. The liberal religion has its own cosmology, its own explanation for why we are here, its own gods, its own clergy. The basic tenet of liberalism is that nature is god and men are monkeys. (Except not as pure-hearted as actual monkeys, who don't pollute, make nukes or believe in God.)

Liberals deny, of course, that liberalism is a religion -- otherwise, they'd lose their government funding. "Separation of church and state" means separation of YOUR church from the state, but total unity between their church and the state.

Two months ago, the 9th Circuit held that a school can prohibit a student from exercising his First Amendment rights by wearing a T-shirt that said "Homosexuality Is Shameful."

Even the left's pretend-adoration of "free speech" (meaning: treason and pornography) must give way to speech that is contrary to the tenets of the church of liberalism on the sacred grounds of a government school.

How might the ACLU respond if a school attempted to ban a T-shirt that said something like "Creationism Is Shameful"? We'd never hear the end of warnings about the coming theocracy.

In fact, students are actually required to wear "Creationism Is Shameful" T-shirts in Dover, Pa., where -- thanks to a lawsuit by the ACLU -- the liberal clergy have declared Darwinism the only true church, immunized from argument. Ye shall put no other God before it. Not one.

Liberals believe in Darwinism as a matter of faith, despite the fact that, at this point, the only thing that can be said for certain about Darwinism is that it would take less time for (1) a single-celled organism to evolve into a human being through mutation and natural selection than for (2) Darwinists to admit they have no proof of (1).

If only Darwinism were true, someday we might evolve public schools with the ability to entertain opposable ideas about the creation of man.


http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15424&o=ANN001”

“

No eye protection?!?!? That's it - she's a idiot.”

“If only Darwinism were true, someday we might evolve public schools with the ability to entertain opposable ideas about the creation of man.

God wrote the Bible in English for a reason: So it could be taught in our public schools.”

“Hillary lashes out at Ann Coulter
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060607/ap_en_ot/coulter9_11_widows_4




From The DRUDGE REPORT:
ANN COULTER RESPONDS TO SEN. CLINTON:
'BEFORE CRITICIZING OTHERS FOR BEING 'MEAN' TO WOMEN, PERHAPS HILLARY SHOULD TALK TO HER HUSBAND WHO WAS ACCUSED OF RAPE BY JUANITA BROADDRICK AND WAS GROPING KATHLEEN WILLEY AT THE VERY MOMENT WILLEY'S HUSBAND WAS COMMITTING SUICIDE.'


Catfight! Catfight! ;-)
LOL, Ann sure can throw bombs.
Sell them books!
Sell them books!”

“fuego whore”

“That's fake. This is real.



He balances a Segway about as good as he balances a budget.
last edited: 6/07/06 5:33:21 PM”

“That's fake. This is real......”
kleetn
5:32:40 PM



DUH!”

“It usually saddens me to watch a crank whore put on a display like that.....


but not this time...LOL

Perhaps Kennedy or Rush can get her into a nice clinic. Her skinny, drawn features, rambling conversation, constant repeating, obvious self loathing and hyper speech are a dead give a way.
last edited: 6/07/06 7:57:43 PM”

“only thing Coulter has going for her is a long neck and big mouth”

“Yeah but she's always got that big mouth open. LOL!”

“DUH!

StoveStomper
3:40:47 PM
6/07/06

No one axed what your middle name was. But still, I think we're all in agreement that's one of the best comebacks you've had in eons.”

“Good one Newbie and welcmoe to the boards.
last edited: 6/08/06 8:42:03 AM”

“welcmoe to the boards

Aren't you going to welcmoe Larry and Curly as well?”

“LOL”

“Too much ado about nothing. Who is Ann Coulter anyway besides a person who seems to have a contract w/the O'Reilly show to make appearances every now and then to stir the pot?

Does she have a title? She just seems to comment on political happenings and write books. I wouldn't really get up in arms about what she says whether it's right or wrong.”

“Title???

Oh, somebody stop me!!!”

“lips, she writes books and sells them by making outlandish statements, just like the Libbie book writers.

She has a new book out. Who would have guessed. LOL
last edited: 6/08/06 11:14:19 AM”

“Thanks Stove. I really don't make a point of listening to her so I didn't know what her deal was.

I just heard she hosts a radio show too.

Someone on tv put it very nicely. If she had a point to make, she did so in a very poor way.”

“I think her title is National Embarrassing Bltch.”

“Great slapdown of Hillary, you have to admit.”

“NJ assemblywomen call for retailers in the state to stop selling new Coulter book

The Associated Press

TRENTON, N.J. - Commentator Ann Coulter's incendiary words about outspoken 9/11 widows have led two state lawmakers to calls for a boycott of her book in the widows' home state of New Jersey.

Assemblywomen Joan M. Quigley, D-Hudson, and Linda Stender, D-Union, on Thursday called on New Jerseyans to stop buying the book, "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," and for retailers in the state to stop selling it.

"Coulter's vicious characterizations and remarks are motivated by greed and her desire to sell books. By making these claims, she proved herself worse than those she is attempting to vilify - she is a leach trying to turn a profit off perverting the suffering of others," the two assemblywomen said in a statement.

A spokeswoman for Crown Forum, the publisher of Coulter's book, did not immediately return calls for comment Thursday.

In her new book, Coulter writes that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World Trade Center act "as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."


She also wrote, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much."

The comments drew criticism Wednesday from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., who said the book should be called "Heartless," and New York's Republican Gov. George Pataki, who said he was stunned by the remarks.

Coulter appeared Tuesday on NBC's "Today" show and stuck by her stance, saying the women used their grief "to make a political point."

Her criticism was aimed at four New Jersey women she dubbed "The Witches of East Brunswick," after the town where two of them live.

The women - Kristen Breitweiser, Lorie Van Auken, Mindy Kleinberg and Patty Casazza - have spent the years since the 2001 terror attacks supporting an independent commission to examine government failures before the attack. During the 2004 presidential race, they endorsed Democrat John Kerry.

June 8, 2006 1:54 PM

http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/104-06082006-667656.html

--------------------------------------


Who said the Dims didn't like Freedom of the Press?
Oh, that's right, Freedom of the Press is ONLY for Liberals.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Buy Banned Books!
Buy Banned Books!
Buy Banned Books!”

“That's pretty damn lame. Usually it's the religionuts calling for book banning. Violin's New Jersey sure is the asscrack of the nation.”

“Stove:

You're really quite pathetic.

Do you have an answer planned for when God asks you how you can take glee in such hateful remarks?
last edited: 6/08/06 2:25:25 PM”

“Poor little violin is having such a bad day.”

“Stove, the dims will still buy the book. They may wait until it's 20% off at Barnes and Noble, but they'll buy it and deny it:)”

“Actually, I saw it was available on Newsmax for $4.99 - discounted from a $27.95 cover price. That's more than 80%, just two days after it was released.”

“NJ sponsoring a good old fashioned book burning? Figures....

Fascist Nazis Dems showing their true colors.

So, Ms. Quigley and Stender, when do the book burnings begin? Perhaps freedom lovers should send them some brown shirts so that their attire can match their ugly words and hateful philosophy...

Change "Ann Coulter" to "The Dixie Chicks" and these politicians would be crucified by the press.”

“violin, hey, there's a lot of money to be made in selling volume at discount prices.

I think she shot her load already by getting the most salacious parts of the book talked about so what's left to read???”

“http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/new-for-you/top-sellers/-/books/all/ref=b_tn_bh_be/103-5777014-8955068

Ban away, Fascist Dems!
Number One at Amazon Books!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL”

“I don't like their music but the photo isn't to bad.
”

““Actually, I saw it was available on Newsmax for $4.99 - discounted from a $27.95 cover price. That's more than 80%, just two days after it was released.”
violin
2:49:27 PM
6/08/06

As always, the vile man is lying again.

From the Newsmax website:
Yes, send me a copy of Ann Coulter's new book "Godless: the Church of Liberalism" as soon as it is published for just $4.99 [plus a s/h charge of $4.50]. I understand I can order one copy per household. I also understand I will get 4 free issues of NewsMax Magazine – a $15 value at no cost to me. At the end of my free subscription, I'll be sent a renewal notice. If I like NewsMax I can do nothing and my subscription will automatically renew at low annual price of $39 by charging my credit card. There's no risk – I can cancel at any time for a full refund of the unused portion of my subscription.


$4.99 + $4.50 + $39 = $48.49 for the book with a sub to the print version of Newsmax.

Yeah! I want those 12 Free CDs too!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL”