Mono Lake battle over home development

“You can write letters here:
http://www.monolake.org/scenicarea/writeletters.htm
http://www.monolake.org/scenicarea/cunningham.htm


From the AP this morning...

LEE VINING, Calif. - Mono Lake, the high desert fascination that is nearly three times as salty as the ocean, remains the home to trillions of brine shrimp where thousands of California Gulls nest each spring - all preserved because of ecological activism.

Twenty years ago, after tireless efforts by the public, Congress designated Mono Lake as the nation\'s first federal scenic area.

Now, some of those same concerned citizens, along with the U.S. Forest Service, fear those protections are imperiled by a plan to subdivide 120 acres for luxury homes on the lake\'s western shore.

\"Everyone\'s lived with the scenic area regulations for 20 years, and I\'m sure they\'ve at times been frustrated by them, but they\'ve worked,\" said Geoff McQuilkin, who helps lead the nonprofit Mono Lake Committee, which opposes the proposal. \"This is kind of the cutting edge of bringing (development) to Mono Lake ... one of the last wild corners of California.\"

A meeting between Monterey-based New Cities Land Co. and Mono County planning officials is set for Thursday, as the company prepares a revised development proposal. Company officials did not return several telephone calls from The Associated Press.

For more than four years, the Forest Service has been trying to add the acres to Inyo National Forest, which includes Mono Lake. The land has aspen groves, springs and a stream that attract wildlife to the boundary where the Sierra Nevada range drops into the Great Basin that stretches through Nevada into Utah.

The agency, according to forest supervisor Jeff Bailey, wants to swap the property for some in the nearby resort community of Mammoth Lakes. The deal, though, has been derailed by a squabble over price. A Forest Service appraisal last year put the land\'s worth at about half the price sought by the property\'s owners.

\"We are so far apart in value that I don\'t think we can even come close,\" Bailey said.

The original plan called for 24 to 30 homes scattered across a highway from the lake, and the county expects the revised proposal to also fit the homes into the hilly landscape to minimize the visual and environmental impact. But the Forest Service ruled last year that developing the property is \"incompatible and detrimental to the integrity of the Scenic Area\".

County planners for years had assumed the Forest Service\'s land restrictions precluded development, until a recent legal opinion held that the county should proceed under its less restrictive zoning regulations.

If the Forest Service doesn\'t like the result, it has its own options - including condemning the land under the 1984 law creating the Mono Basin National Forest Scenic Area. Bailey said he would recommend that step, but McQuilkin fears the Bush administration won\'t enforce the scenic area\'s ban on development if it comes to condemning private property.

\"It quickly moves out of local hands and moves to Washington, where it becomes a political issue,\" McQuilkin said.

The lake sits on the sparsely inhabited border between California and Nevada, just east of Yosemite National Park. Besides its wildlife, it draws tourists to view tufa towers, oddly shaped limestone deposits created by underwater springs. Just to the south are the upheavals of the youngest volcanic chain in North America.

In the 1872 book, \"Roughing It,\" Mark Twain wonders at an isolated lake in which water flows in but never flows out, evaporating instead at a rate of about 45 inches a year.

The lake was on a path to destruction after Los Angeles diverted four tributary streams into the LA Aqueduct in 1941. The move followed the much more publicized diversion to the south that turned Owens Lake into a dusty plain; Mono Lake eventually lost half its volume and doubled its salinity.

The federal scenic designation and subsequent California water rights rulings in 1986 and 1994 helped reverse the decline, and the lake is expected to reach what state and federal authorities set as an \"environmentally sustainable\" level by 2014, still well shy of its pre-diversion level.

On the Net:

Mono Basin Clearinghouse: www.monobasinresearch.org

Mono Lake Committee: www.monolake.org

Inyo National Forest: www.fs.fed.us/r5/inyo”

“THEY BETTER NOT BUILD HOMES THERE! I will do everything in my power to stop this, which isn't much by myself, but it'll be better than nothing. I'm writing local and federal officials over this one. Mono Lake is gorgeous and it's already over-developed.”

“That is So wrong!”

“No, they shouldn't build homes there. Protest the hell outta it!

But it's not unlike umpteen other similar situations happening each week throughout the U.S.

Keep abreast of things and make sure something like it isn't happening in your own treasured, local areas.

When our own county commissioners here wanted to sell the scenic 400+ acres they owned along the Root River and the Root River bicycle trail, it seemed I was the only one speaking out and asking them to consider sitting on it until the state DNR had enough funds to buy and add it to surrounding state forest land, precluding development. I wrote about it in my weekly column, pleading....

Many, many Twin City-ites move here for second homes or to retire. (Remember?? Lanesboro, MN is on Outside mag's "Top 20" recreational towns list for 2004)

So whether it's a well-known entity like Mono Lake -- or development in the wild Root River Valley -- keep on top of things.

Luckily, the commissioners sold land on one side of the river to a man who wants to keep it as is for hunting purposes. And they are keeping the other side.

Potential development stopped -- for now.”

“You just really need to stay on top of what's happening in your local and federal government.

Often times, by the time the general public knows enough to make a protest, it's too late.

And the government officials will tell you that you missed your opportunity at the early levels of discussion. Where was your input then, they ask?

Keep on top of it!”

“It would be awesome to get a home over there!! Then maybe they could get rid of that pesky non-motorized rule, then I could get a ski boat and do some turns around Negit Island.












Just kidding.”