![]() |
Welcome to thebackpacker.com create account login |
![]() |
LET'S DRILL ANWARView Messages“Drilling in ANWAR will have no effect. All of the oil drilled in Alaska goes to Japan and so will ANWAR oil. The government can not and never will regulate who private businesses do business with and the drillers in ANWAR are private business.” 1:20:12 AM 4/27/05 “At the Wilderness Society website it is also stated that there is no interest by private industry in oil development at ANWR because there is no money to be made from such an effort. It would cost far more to bring that oil to market than it can possibly be sold for. Market conditions might eventually change, but until then the owners of that resource, namely all Americans should consider it money in the bank to be left in the bank. There is a much greater resource available, not so much in fuel efficiency, but rather in reduced driving by millions of individuals who acquire employment or housing in closer proximity to the other, carpooling, intelligent planning driving trips to combine errands, decreasing the number of extracuricular activities for schools, returning to a system of neighborhood schools, more folks adopting home-schooling, development of more labor intensive organic agriculture, reducing the pet population considerably, including horses, get away from such sports oriented 'madness' which involves millions commuting thousands of miles frequently for a couple of hour 'fix', etc. The list of ways to save miles is endless! last edited: 4/27/05 6:30:59 AM” 6:22:50 AM 4/27/05 “Another relevent point, the Alaska Pipeline has yet to pay for itself. If the money spent by private industry and the federal government to develop Prudhoe Bay oil had been spent in windmills for the last 35 years, we would all be a lot better off now. Windmills are one alternative that can produce considerably more energy than is required to build them not so with, hydropower nuclear power ethanol fuel cells There is more than double the amount of oil in the world contained in oil-shale than remains as conventional petroleum, but there again much energy and water is required to extract the oil from the shale. The 2000 acre claim at ANWR is a VERY BIG LIE!. IT IS REALITY A 1,500,000 ACRE PROPOSED PROJECT! last edited: 4/27/05 6:57:35 AM” 6:48:15 AM 4/27/05 “"The list of ways to save miles is endless!" cutting out driving 500 miles for an 8 mile backpacking trip because you love nature so much” 6:56:24 AM 4/27/05 “Well, driving 500 miles by yourself or with one or more others in the vehcle - big difference. Buses or trains will easily carry a person and pack to near a destination. And forgive me, but I try to take with only one passenger a 52 day drive around North America each year, currently in a Ford Excursion. But, my gardening activities are conducted without motorized equipment or fossil fuel based fertilizers and pesticides and my commute to work is only about 20 feet from my bedroom. last edited: 4/27/05 7:06:12 AM” 7:02:34 AM 4/27/05 “I commute one mile to work on foot. I get about 500 miles to a pair of walking shoes. We can grow our own diesel fuel crops to power engines that are already here and running successfully. The emissions from bio-diesel are non-toxic. The trick would be to keep the profits from bio-diesel in the hands of family farms and local entrepreneurs and out of the hands of corrupt corporate thieves.” 7:33:27 AM 4/27/05 “Another point about trucks and sports utility vehicles - Street radial tires allow a mile or two per gallon better fuel efficiency than those 'insane' off-road tires that most such vehicles are equipped with. Most are rarely if ever driven off-road, plus they handle better (are safer - not as likely to explode either - 'Ford Exploders') and are much quieter in operation. last edited: 4/27/05 7:49:57 AM” 7:48:29 AM 4/27/05 “When I see this thread title, I still keep thinking... won't they let poor departed Pres. Safat lie in peace. I guess no one else is as demented as I am (or remembers anything about the guy).” 12:14:32 PM 4/27/05 Psst! Ped..... “Sadat last edited: 4/27/05 12:43:47 PM” 12:43:09 PM 4/27/05 “oops... lousy proof reading there.” 11:14:36 AM 4/28/05 “Sadat got drilled, alright.” 11:50:21 AM 4/28/05 “Received this in an email tonight. Both the House and Senate passed a budget resolution Thursday night that paves the way for oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. But keep your chin up! This fight is not over yet, and this is no time to relax our efforts. To complete its raid on the Arctic, Congress must still pass a "budget reconciliation" bill. We're counting on your continued activism to help us fight and win that last and decisive round. Thousands of phone calls and messages from activists like you made Thursday's budget votes extremely close. Our Arctic heroes included 11 House Republicans (see list below) who defied their party leadership by voting against the budget in order to save the Arctic Refuge. In the Senate, two brave Republicans -- Senator Chafee (RI) and Senator DeWine (OH) -- stood up for the Arctic. Those who let us down included 20 moderate Republicans in the House and five in the Senate: Senators Coleman (MN), Collins (ME), Snowe (ME), McCain (AZ) and Smith (OR). They voted for the Arctic Refuge in the past but abandoned us Thursday night. Every House and Senate Democrat opposed the final budget resolution, although not always for environmental reasons. But seven House Democrats missed the vote altogether, which we lost 214-211. Please check the lists below to see if your senator and/or representative was a Hero, a Disappointment or a No-Show. If so, please call them at the phone number provided and deliver the message suggested below. These calls are enormously important. They will set the stage for the final round in this historic fight. Our targeted members of Congress need to know that pro-Arctic constituents like you will be watching their next vote very closely. If you are unable to telephone, then please go to the Senate website [http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm] or the House website [http://www.house.gov/writerep/], where you can look up your members of Congress and send them email messages. In the meantime, you can be sure that the NRDC Action Fund will be working day and night to defeat any budget reconciliation bill that includes Arctic drilling. Thank you again for taking the time to defend the Arctic in its hour of need! Sincerely, John H. Adams NRDC Action Fund . . . ARCTIC HEROES Call (between 9am and 6pm eastern time) and thank them for voting against the budget resolution last week because it threatened the Arctic Refuge. Urge them to defend the Arctic again when the budget reconciliation bill comes to a vote. Tell them you'll be watching their vote closely. Senator Lincoln Chafee (RI): 202-224-2921 Senator Mike DeWine (OH): 202-224-2315 Representative Charles Bass (NH-2): 202-225-5206 Representative Sherwood Boehlert (NY-24): 202-225-3665 Representative Michael Castle (DE-at large): 202-225-4165 Representative Nancy Johnson (CT-5): 202-225-4476 Representative Timothy Johnson (IL-15): 202-225-2371 Representative Jim Leach (IA-2): 202-225-6576 Representative Frank LoBiondo (NJ-2): 202-225-6572 Representative Jim Ramstad (MN-3): 202-225-2871 Representative Jim Saxton (NJ-3): 202-225-4765 Representative Christopher Shays (CT-4): 202-225-5541 Representative Rob Simmons (CT-2): 202-225-2076 ARCTIC DISAPPOINTMENTS Call (between 9am and 6pm eastern time) and express your deep disappointment that they abandoned the Arctic Refuge last week by voting for a bad budget resolution. Urge them to make up for it by defending the Arctic when the budget reconciliation bill comes to a vote. Tell them you'll be watching their vote closely. Senator Norm Coleman (MN): 202-224-5641 Senator Susan Collins (ME): 202-224-2523 Senator John McCain (AZ): 202-224-2235 Senator Gordon Smith (OR): 202-224-3753 Senator Olympia Snowe (ME): 202-224-5344 Representative Roscoe Bartlett (MD-6): 202-225-2721 Representative Jeb Bradley (NH-1): 202-225-5456 Representative Tom Davis (VA-11): 202-225-1492 Representative Vernon Ehlers (MI-3): 202-225-3831 Representative Mike Ferguson (NJ-7): 202-225-5361 Representative Rodney Frelinghuysen (NJ-11): 202-225-5034 Representative Jim Gerlach (PA-6): 202-225-4315 Representative Wayne Gilchrest (MD-1): 202-225-5311 Representative Bob Inglis (SC-4): 202-225-6030 Representative Mark Kennedy (MN-6): 202-225-2331 Representative Mark Kirk (IL-10): 202-225-4835 Representative John R. "Randy" Kuhl, Jr. (NY-29): 202-225-3161 Representative Jim Nussle (IA-1): 202-225-2911 Representative Thomas Petri (WI-6): 202-225-2476 Representative Dave Reichert (WA-8): 202-225-7761 Representative John J.H. "Joe" Schwarz (MI-7): 202-225-6276 Representative F. James Sensenbrenner (WI-5): 202-225-5101 Representative Christopher Smith (NJ-4): 202-225-3765 Representative John Sweeney (NY-20): 202-225-5614 Representative James Walsh (NY-25): 202-225-3701 ARCTIC NO-SHOWS Call (between 9am and 6pm eastern time) and express your disappointment that they were absent for the budget resolution vote. Tell them you're counting on them to defend the Arctic Refuge when the budget reconciliation bill comes to a vote. Representative James Clyburn (SC-6): 202-225-3315 Representative Lloyd Doggett (TX-25): 202-225-4865 Representative Bob Filner (CA-51): 202-225-8045 Representative Harold Ford, Jr. (TN-9): 202-225-3265 Representative William Jefferson (LA-2): 202-225-6636 Representative Steven Rothman (NJ-9): 202-225-5061 Representative Edolphus Towns (NY-10): 202-225-5936 I see one from Tenn. did show and vote. Guess who gets a call tomorrow last edited: 5/03/05 10:41:41 PM” 10:40:23 PM 5/03/05 “Why should anyone care if a remote place (that almost no one will ever see that Alaskans refer to as not particularly attractive or amenable to an outdoor experience) becomes an industrial wasteland? OK, so it will not be a wasteland and could actually be some reclaimed after the oil harvesting activity. And besides there is an Artic coast of a much greater extent in Canada that will remain undisturbed. Well, ANWR is somewhat unigue, in that it was not covered by ice-sheets during the last ice-age and most of the Canadian Arctic coasts were. Botanically and zoologically, it is a hotspot, a living laboratory and museum of ages passed. My college aged nephew ask me awhile back where he could go and walk hundreds of miles without encountering people. He understands the appeal and draw of such a place even if he never gets there. You either understand or you don't! After the oil-age is concluded, I feel all Alaska lands North of the Arctic Circle should be cleaned up, roads and facilities erased and be completely returned to Wild-Lands (with the historical number of natives living their historical lifestyle if they so choose). On another web-site, an Alaskan resident (non-native) complained about the lack of water and sewer services in Alaska and felt more money and jobs were needed in Alaska. A response by another person at that site who was formerly a federal worker in Alaska stated that hundreds of millions have been spent on such boondoggle projects there, often in some communities amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars per resident, extremely expensive to install and nearly impossible to maintain and operate in that environment. Maybe, just maybe, traditional technigues employed by low numbers of people is appropriate for Alaska. Wild-Lands Rule!” 7:27:42 AM 5/04/05
Post a MessageIn order to post a response to this thread you must first be logged in. If you do not already have an account, you must first create a new account.
|
SearchReady to Buy Gear?Sponsored Links
Great Outdoor SitesLinks |