Global Warming

“LOL./...Mitt of "dog in a carrier on the roof of the family car?"”

“Mitt didn't raise the bid on Iowa, just to get a generation of bacon named after himself.”

“
Today in Washington, DC

The American Association for the Advancement of Science holds the first in a series of climate change discussions, with William Hooke of the American Meteorological Society. 6 p.m., AAAS Auditorium, 12th and H Sts. N.W.

          Be there or be square ---

”

“Remember all the global warming discussions last year that had to be cancelled due to snow?

I'm freaking serious! LMAO!!!”

“Sarge, here's a newsflash for you: Global warming can create snow.”

“LMAO!!!

OH MAN ROSEY! YOU ARE KRACKING ME UP TODAY!

YOU ARE FUNNY!”

“I'm glad. 'Cause you are cracked!”

“You read that   #&%!$  ?”

“Heatwave: Man-made global warming.

Tidal wave: Man-made global warming.

Snow: Man-made global warming.

No snow: Man-made global warming.

Sno-globe: Man-made global warming.

Grassy knoll: Man-made global warming.

Hurricane: Man-made global warming.

Himicane: Man-made global warming.

Too hot: Man-made global warming.

Too cold: Man-made global warming.


This man-made global warming is the most convenient thing to come along since sliced bread. It can be the cause of everything! Reminds me of a line from some movie....I'll have to find it.




Found it. From the Terminator:

This is great stuff. I could make a career out of this guy. You see how clever this part is...how it doesn't require a shred of proof. Most paranoid delusions are intricate...but this is brilliant.
last edited: 11/05/07 3:43:41 PM”

“Remember, the closer to the equator, the less it will warm up - maybe 1 or 2 degrees at the equator, but up to 12 degrees at the poles. The point is that HEAT isn't the only thing that GW causes.

Now GWB, he causes lots of heat... hot air (grin).”

“Remember, the closer to the equator, the less it will warm up - maybe 1 or 2 degrees at the equator, but up to 12 degrees at the poles. The point is that HEAT isn't the only thing that GW causes.

???

It heats up different amounts in different locations, point being it doesn't just cause heat?”

“The average worldwide temperature rises, but with the chaotic elements (for lack of a better term) injected into the system, it's postulated that some locations will actually cool while others warm more than the average one or two dergrees, as some areas will suffer drought while others receive flooding rains, etc.

One cannot expect a linear rise in temperature in all areas.”

“exactly. like when the arctic ice cap shrinks and the antarctic ice cap grows to its historic maximum”

“Sure.... like the 3400 square kilometers of the Larsen Ice Shelf that collapsed into the ocean in 2002.”

“I'm just grateful the Great lakes levels are down so much. maybe when the glaciers all melt we won't drown.”

“Watch out.... I think the New Mexicans are starting to get ideas about all that fresh water you've got up there.”

“We're not shipping any out. All for us!”

“Thanks for clarifying, Tilt.”

“I wouldn't think something like that would need clarifying, but hey....

Pehaps it would get the point across better to say "If you perform an uncontrolled experiment on the atmosphere by dumping huge amounts of anything into it, kooky things are bound to happen".”

“Getting too hot for ya?

Open a window.”

“Gore will be not be pleased.”

“High piles.”

“Gomer Pyles”

“Dog piles?”

“pileated peckerwoods?

(Dryocopus pileatus)”

“http://media.newsbusters.org/stories/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history.html?q=blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/07/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history

Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming ‘Greatest Scam in History’

There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. ”

“Hah! The Weather Channel? Obviously a neocon stronghold.


-post by NC.
last edited: 11/08/07 5:49:19 PM”

“riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!

lol”

“In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious.

We won't last that long, Pervez will nuke us before then.”

“Boy. This place is such a boon of information.



Screw all the peer-reviewed stuff.



I seen it on the Trail Talk -- it must be true.”

“Even outside of Trail Talk, peer review and concensus does not equal fact.”

“But if a TV weatherman has read up on it and knows he's right, THAT equals fact.”

“Well, yeah. :P”

“I am not going to argue whether there is global warming or not. My argument is that a few years data doesn't tell us squat for whats happening on a planet. But if like the blind squirrel these guys happen to be right (they have a 33% chance of being correct - the earth is warming, cooling, or maintaining status quo) I don't believe that we humans are gonna stop whatever is happening from happening. In the past, the oceans have been a hundred meters lower than it is now and 400 meters higher. Buy high ground
last edited: 11/09/07 4:12:16 AM”

“Can somebody explain how there can be a 300 year lag in the direct correlation of heat changes to carbon monoxide changes, and you still believe there is man-made global warming because of our emmissions? Al Gore lied when he overlayed the graphs to match in his movie and everybody knows it. The main premise of his theory is a known lie.”

“The same data sounds better saying no than yes?
Quack!
last edited: 11/09/07 6:20:18 AM”

“There's no mention of him at Weather.com.  One of our local newbie weathermen (BA degree in communications, not physics) did a blurb about this on their website.... He called the Weather Channel and they wouldn't even confirm if the guy had ever worked there.”

“Compare Bush's house to Gore's house:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp”

“Tilt, it says Weather Channel founder.”

“Oh!  Nevermind.  That makes all the imbecilic things Bush has done to go easy on polluters okay.
I especially liked the way he filled all the spots he could at the EPA with the polluters lobbyists.

        Way   Ta   Go   George.

And Kudos to your supporters.”

“But don't you find that the details of each personal residence is a pardox? Mr. Environmental is so wasteful, while Mr. Polluter is so careful. Both fly in the face of what you would expect for their own homes.”

“No --- you people piss in your pants about one house while at the same time supporting the scum who dump tons of crap into your childrens' air and water ever day.

What's up with that?
last edited: 11/09/07 8:59:11 AM”

“Tilt - if you'll notice, I'm not trying to stir up an arguement. I simply asked if it was suprising on the difference. The difference is suprising to me. Instead of answering the question you're flinging crap. I don't normally play the game that way.”

“Tilt - get off my ass. I asked a general question and you reply with the maturity of a 6th grader. Where am I pissing my pants? No I even normally participate on these threads? Save your drama for the people you normally argue with. I went to snopes looking for that weather.com thing and someone came across the link I supplied. I thought it interesting, posted it, and got ambushed. Finally, find one post that I've posted in the last 3 years praising Bush. I voted for him both times as the lesser of 2 bad choices.”

“Nice passive-aggression, there.

No --- misguided people now attack Gore however they can because they can't pretend that climate change isn't happening anymore.

It's simply an attempt at misdirection.”

“Tilt - honestly, none of that was my intent. I found the link interesting and posted it. There was nothing passive about my aggression. You're being a prick and I called you on it. Also, I've never said climate change isn't happening. It is happening. Folks like to say it's all or nothing. I suspect we're party to blame and it's possible that we're speeding up a natural trend.”

“Nobody can address the carbon/heat correlation?

hmmm ... THE key point of the alarmists, and nobody wants to go there.”

“What kind of prick supports George Bush?”

“The kind willing to talk rationally and answer questions instead of being emotional and flinging mud. I think I'm done with fuego for the day. I'll peek back when you're over your period.”

“It's a purely rhetorical question.”