Global Warming

“Getting thirty thousand more troops to Afghaniscam will trump that one.”

“who cares? the point is global warming is a hoax, and they hypocrites know it”

“The whole pollution subject goes down with a few e-mails? You are showing that you`re the new Al Gore Alarmist.
last edited: 12/07/09 9:36:37 AM”

“Of course, when the emails claim that the data that everybody based their conclusions on were not only fudged, but later discarded so that everyone would have to take their word for it.

I'd say "yeah" it all went down with that.


Funny how the "scientists" don't seem to care about the scientific method anymore.

(LOL)”

“In all seriousness, now that the reality of the "peer reviewed" processes has been exposed, and the data has shown not only to be falsified, but to be hidden from further scrutiny, I would think the scientists on here would be like "you know what guys, you're right, this is not good for science and we need to rethink this".

The politics of it all, the "us versus them" mentality, has obviously taken over. I and others have been pointing this out for a while now, but I believe the blatancy of it in this case should be obvious.

So at this point, we should be asking what is going on here. Which is happening?

1. the alarmists are just in a "disbelief" period and need some time to cool off before the come around and realize they've be had.

2. they are somehow benefiting from continuing the scam, such as the other "scientists" and politicians, perhaps in a monetary way receiving a grant or similar benefit.

3. they have other motives they are unwilling to announce. Perhaps they do indeed want a one-world government or a dictatorship or similar, and are hoping that the mandated controls of government on business and civilians will be a means to that end.

4. they are just not getting it. They just are lacking in some mental capacity to see what it so obvious.

5. they are just trolling.

I seriously doubt it is #4. I also have reservations that so many are in the #2 category, although I suppose 1 or 2 on here may be.”

“You still light as easily as a loaded crack pipe.”

“personal insults when you have no argument will get you everywhere, big boy”

“"Perhaps they do indeed want a one-world government or a dictatorship or similar, and are hoping that the mandated controls of government on business and civilians will be a means to that end."

you seriously cannot possibly be that dumb”

“Until Proof, in the form of long term observations can be seen, all this shows is how both sides of this totally stupid theory can cause damage to any reasonable studies in the future. We need to get down to the local damage being done and forget this and all other religious VooDoo that is used to cover the local pollution being done.”

“personal insults when you have no argument will get you everywhere, big boy

(for pepsi)
last edited: 12/07/09 9:51:31 AM”

“We need to get down to the local damage being done

Local governments are doing just that.”

“pepsi are you denying there is a growing desire in the present government to exercise more and more control over private business?”

“"Local governments are doing just that.”

And, the ones that do, lose industry to lower regulations elsewhere. Standardization is important and Tariffs should be applied to imports from countries with lower standards. Protectionism is healthy when done properly.”

“everybody in the world is damned if they do, damned if they don't with you”

“Cause they`re all fake boobs.”

“what are you?”

“Just one of the fake boobs growing on the USA bowling ball that always finds the gutter.”

“perhaps the fakest of all boobs”

“all this shows is how both sides of this totally stupid theory can cause damage - salebored

LOL! Pure salebored - both sides suck, maaaan!”

“Both ends suck, the sides are another whole issue, mAAAn.”

“Green conference has about 1200 limos: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html


Nice comment about the prostitutes chipping in.”

“They`ll write the travel expenses off their taxes along with dah hookers un drugs un dah fart cow dinner.”

“http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=544&filename=1120593115.txt

From: Phil Jones
To: John Christy
Subject: This and that
Date: Tue Jul 5 15:51:55 2005

John,
There has been some email traffic in the last few days to a week - quite a bit really, only a small part about MSU. The main part has been one of your House subcommittees wanting Mike Mann and others and IPCC to respond on how they produced their reconstructions and how IPCC produced their report.
In case you want to look at this see later in the email !

Also this load of rubbish !

This is from an Australian at BMRC (not Neville Nicholls). It began from the attached article. What an idiot. The scientific community would come down on me in no uncertain terms if I said the world had cooled from 1998. OK it has but it is only 7 years of data and it isn't statistically significant.


(it is if the trend had reversed itself!)”

“This is cool. Like the climate.”

“LOL

http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2009/12/08/four_colossal_holes_in_the_theory_of_man-made_global_warming?page=full&comments=true”

“next
last edited: 12/08/09 8:08:56 AM”

“
Oil prices will only go down from now on.”

“Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after `Danish text` leak

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text”

“The moonbats seem to be staying away from this thread for some reason. LOL”

“haha - i noticed that too”

“Kinda like Harry Reid stayed away from reality in the whole slavery/equal rights issue.”

“http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/03/researcher-says-nasa-hiding-climate-data/

Chris Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said NASA has refused for two years to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act that would show how the agency has shaped its climate data and would explain why the agency has repeatedly had to correct its data going as far back as the 1930s.

"I assume that what is there is highly damaging," Mr. Horner said. "These guys are quite clearly bound and determined not to reveal their internal discussions about this."

The numbers matter. Under pressure in 2007, NASA recalculated its data and found that 1934, not 1998, was the hottest year in its records for the contiguous 48 states. NASA later changed that data again, and now 1998 and 2006 are tied for first, with 1934 slightly cooler

If and when it is released I am certain it will show willful misrepresentations. At that time I would hope each every scientist involved is stripped of even his/her highschool diplomas. That each and every penny will be repaid to the Government even to the siezure and sale of their personal assets.

Sorry but these clowns have willingly participated in a corruption scandal that sucked Trillions of dollars out of world economies, and they should be made to pay for life.”

“Gore trying to cover up the lies -

http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/climategate_gore_falsifies_the_record”

“Lemmings.

http://rawstory.com/2009/12/fox-host-promoted-poll-adding-120-valedictorian/”

“Once again, those were quoted numbers from Rasmussen. Fox didn't make up the numbers, or put them into the context you are (that they should add to 100).”

“***crickets***




(LOL)”

“LOL! They are trying to discredit Fox because they have no case for global warming! LOL

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/americans_skeptical_of_science_behind_global_warming

Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Americans say it’s at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data to support their own theories and beliefs about global warming. Thirty-five percent (35%) say it’s Very Likely. Just 26% say it’s not very or not at all likely that some scientists falsified data.”

“So, what you are saying is the Fox has no accountability and should be allowed to spew whatever it wants, right or wrong, just because someone else said it?

What happened to your argument yesterday that the numbers were RIGHT, Sarge?

Again, lemmings. Do a search on confirmation bias. You guys are textbook examples.
last edited: 12/09/09 8:59:27 AM”

“first off, it is right - I never changed that.

secondly, Fox was reporting what was reported by Rasmussen.

thirdly, you got nutt'n”

“first off, it is right - I never changed that.

LMAO!!!!

Awesome. Thank you for being you.”

“You FUEGO boys are keeping this site alive.

Many thanks!”

“Bwaahahaha. Good one, MarkO!!!”

“Check out how the left is grasping for straws now that the lie has been exposed.”

“Give us a nice straw man, Sarge.

Hoo hoo ha ha ha ha ha!!”

“How are those scientific numbers supporting global warming coming along? Are they almost finished?”

“That email thing is all you connies have got.
Talk about grasping!

Ha ha ha ha ha!!”

“the email thing where it proves the numbers were faked, then deleted that the scientists had based their conclusions on? yeah, that is all we got, plus the whole earth getting cooler thingy”

“yea, it's like really cold today, therefore global warming doesnt exixt”

“Never mind the glaciers. Never mind the north pole. Never mind that Australias turning to dust. Never mind, never mind, never mind...

Dang nabbit! those emails PROVE its all fake!!

Sarge, denial isnt a river in Egypt...”