Global Warming

““...funny how it just HAPPENS to assist in a socialist, anti-capitalist agenda, under the guise of saving the planet.�
HighPlainsDrifter
5:15:14 PM
12/01/09”

How are the communist infiltrators doing?

“We got one as President since that post, so .... looks like I was right AGAIN.”
HiGHPLAiNSDRiFTER
10:49:58 AM
4/05/10

We got a communist infiltrator as president since 12/01/09 ??

LMMFAO !!

Its time for the canvas shirt, boys.”

“he went from socialist to communist once he pushed the Constitution out the window.”

“You're puttin' just a bit too much nuts in your fruitcake, Sarge.”

“Do you like fruitcakes without nuts?
last edited: 4/05/10 10:08:55 AM”

“Bang bang, Fruit fruit!!”

“Gappiness is a warm hun”

“Why are the erstwhile Commie-haters climbing over each other to get through the door at MalWart?

Isn't that peculiar.”

“I think they actually hate themselves and wish to see America fail.

After all, they nearly succeeded at destroying capitalism by creating this current recession.............dang freaks!”

“ka-ching!”

“There's one of them now!”

“They'd rather see the country fail than have it succeed under anyone else's leadership.

They'd rather wreck the environment rather than be proved wrong about climate.”

“^^ no mention of science or peer-reviewed articles ^^”

“They'd rather wreck the environment

I thought we'd past the point of no return already.”

“Increase in Arctic ice confounds doomsayers - end of global warming, scientists warn

By Daily Mail Reporter
03rd April 2010


The amount of sea ice covering the Arctic dramatically increased last month, reaching levels not seen at this time of year for nearly a decade.

Returning ice - after years of declining cover - has astonished climate scientists who blamed unusually cold weather over the Bering Sea.

Researchers said they recorded the most ice in March since 2001 - and that the cover is approaching long-term average levels for the first time in ten years.


The returning ice has been blamed on unusually cold weather over the Bering Sea

The scientists who released the data stressed that last month's rise was part of yearly variations in ice cover and could not be taken as a sign that global warming is coming to an end.

But sceptics argued that the findings undermined 'alarmist' claims that the North Pole could be free of summer ice by 2013.

The unusual trend last month is revealed in figures published by the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado.

In a typical year, Arctic ice cover peaks in mid-March and starts to fall as milder weather arrives.

But this year, levels continued to grow in the second half of March. Dr Mark Serreze, of the NSlDC, said parts of the Arctic were going through an unusually cold spring - but that other areas were warmer than normal.

He added: 'What this doesn't show is any indication that global warming is over. If you look at the Arctic as a whole we might get to average amounts of sea ice for the time of year. But the ice is thin and quite vulnerable and it can melt very quickly.'

The best measure of the health of the Arctic was not only the amount of cover, but also the thickness of ice, he said.

But Dr David Whitehouse, of the Global Warming Policy Foundation think-tank, said: 'The recent observations make the 2007 projections that the region would be ice free by 2013 look very unrealistic.'”

“The most ice since 2001- We are about back to burning about the same amount of fossil fuel as in 2001 with this recession.”

“Remember, the planet is only 3000 years old....”

“No longer a concern, Massey can't produce the culprit coal --- buy down and fleese. BBBUURRRR!! 50 citations in the last month?”

“Why did stratdood's cut&paste end right before this paragraph?:

The scientists who released the data stressed that last month's rise was part of yearly variations in ice cover and could not be taken as a sign that global warming is coming to an end.


Why did he leave this out?:

In a typical year, Arctic ice cover peaks in mid-March and starts to fall as milder weather arrives.

But this year, levels continued to grow in the second half of March. Dr Mark Serreze, of the NSlDC, said parts of the Arctic were going through an unusually cold spring - but that other areas were warmer than normal.

He added: 'What this doesn't show is any indication that global warming is over. If you look at the Arctic as a whole we might get to average amounts of sea ice for the time of year. But the ice is thin and quite vulnerable and it can melt very quickly.'

The best measure of the health of the Arctic was not only the amount of cover, but also the thickness of ice, he said.




Finally... why did he alter the dailymail's headline?:

Increase in Arctic ice confounds doomsayers - but does not spell the end of global warming, scientists warn

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1263207/Increase-Arctic-ice-confounds-doomsayers.html”

“dewd is full of $hit.”

“OK - so he got the middle part after all.”

“So vileboy is full of $hit.”

“He's a Bea Tagger, let's form a posse.”

“Scientist warn?

Which scientists? The ones who have been faking the data all along?

Yeah, those scientists....yeah, we believe you...”

“but does not spell the end of global warming, scientists warn

Move along...nothing to see here.”

“Tomorrow's headline:

Global Warming Causes Increase in Arctic Ice”

“When the warm heavy salt currents flow under the fresh water melt floating on the surface, things cool and thus forms thiner ice quickly, because of the higher freezing temp. But, because the ice is thiner and spread over a greater area it naturally melts faster and the cycle goes on. This was all figured out 25 years ago.”

“2 more glaciers gone from Glacier National Park

BILLINGS, Mont. � Glacier National Park has lost two more of its namesake moving icefields to climate change, which is shrinking the rivers of ice until they grind to a halt, a government researcher said Wednesday.

Warmer temperatures have reduced the number of named glaciers in the northwestern Montana park to 25, said Dan Fagre said, an ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey. He warned many of the rest of the glaciers may be gone by the end of the decade...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100407/ap_on_re_us/us_disappearing_glaciers”

“That's so sad....poor glaicers”

“ice has feelings too”

“yeah but all that oppressed water is now liberated....

Happy Ending”

“I would like to hear from the west coast TTers what they think about water concerns (specifically supply thereof).”

“I've got plenty of water.”

“Where do you live and where does the water derive from?”

“In Sacramento. Water comes from the Sierra Nevada range via the Sacramento and American rivers. We're at 124% of normal for precip and snowpack this year.”

“I think So Cal folks need to be more concerned about their long term sources of water.”

“For sure. The Colorado River, their primary supply of water, is in the 11th year of a drought.”

“Yea, and everyone is wanting a bigger straw.”

“I'm moving up to Al Gore National Park in Montana, I hear they've got a big melt happening up there.”

“Wow, the way the RNC is melting away it'll be liberated before the Nov.2010 freeze.”

“How are those ocean filling floods doing on that sea level thing, can the oil on all the oceans stop enough evaporation to keep the ocean out of my garage?”

“Stunning Pictures of Al Gore's New $9 Million Mansion Media Totally Ignored
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
Mon, 05/03/2010 - 23:45 ET


Nobel Laureate Al Gore purchased a $9 million mansion in the luxurious hills of Montecito, California, recently, and with the exception of the Los Angeles Times and Fox News, America's media couldn't care less.

You think it might be because the Gore-loving press wouldn't want people to consider the possibility that all of his global warming hysteria was really about lining his wallet and not saving the planet?

Formulate a response to that question as you look at what all that money the former Vice President is making off of spreading this myth can buy (h/t Doug Ross):





Sweet, wouldn't you say? (Readers are encouraged to view more pictures of this fabulous estate here.)

Certainly not bad for a guy who supposedly was worth between one and two million dollars in 2000.

Were the "Always Fascinated by the Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" press interested?

Heck no.

According to LexisNexis, apart from the Los Angeles Times that broke this story last Wednesday, and Fox News's Sean Hannity who spoke about this on consecutive nights last week, America's media were totally mum.

Why might that be?

You think Gore's adoring press don't want folks to know how much money he's making off this scam?

Before you answer THAT question, consider what the Nobel Laureate told Congress last year as the House was deliberating cap-and-trade legislation:



AL GORE: Every penny that I have made, I have put right into a non-profit deal, Alliance For Climate Protection, to spread awareness of why we have to take on this challenge. And Congresswomen, if your, if, if you believe that the reason I have been working on this issue for 30 years is because of greed, you do not know me.

Now, imagine for a moment there were actually journalists still in America and not advocates pretending to be journalists.

A former Vice President who last year told a House committee he was putting all of his earnings into a non-profit company to "spread awareness of why we have to take on" global warming a year later buys a $9 million mansion with six fireplaces, five bedrooms, and nine bathrooms for him and his wife.

Don't you think SOMEBODY should have reported it other than Fox News, the LA Times, and conservative bloggers?

Where'd the money come from? Was this purchased by his non-profit corporation, and if so, how does he get away with that?

Did he sell some of his Google or Apple stock?

And how about some questions about how green the house is? Are there solar panels and windmills to power this facility? If not, what are their plans?

Forgetting all of that, if the Clintons, Bushes, or Cheneys bought such a place, do you think the media would cover it, at least as a human interest story?

For over three years, Gore's adoring press have followed virtually every move he's made since becoming the voice of global warming.

He buys a STUNNING villa as the unemployment rate stands at almost 10 percent and Americans are struggling to regain their footing after 2008's financial crisis, and the media are suddenly disinterested in him?

On exactly which planet, be it cooling or warming, does THAT make any sense?

More reading concerning Gore's investments:

•Media Ignore Al Gore's Financial Ties To Global Warming
•Al Gore Getting Rich Selling Global Warming Hysteria With Media's Help
•Gore Admits Financial 'Stake' In Advancing Global Warming Hysteria
•Investment Group Puts Millions In Green Companies Gore Has Stake In


Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/05/03/stunning-pictures-al-gores-new-9-million-mansion-media-totally-ignore#ixzz0n5ErHSi7”

“The dOOd is against free enterprise when it's a democrat enterprising. He's being just like the preachers that get caught with hookers dOOd. IN 2000 SCOTUS gave Al a gift, he made all the money and Queen George became the biggest asswipe in history.”

“Global Warming: Is There Anything it Can't Do?

From Tr*ll's post:

Under the Obama Administration, after evaluating the latest climate science, the EPA finally released the "endangerment finding" in December 2009, highlighting the public health implications of unabated global warming emissions. These include: longer heat waves that harm the sick, poor, and elderly; extreme weather events that can lead to death and injuries; and increases in ground-level ozone linked to respiratory illnesses like asthma.

Now, rather than allowing the EPA to take the next step in regulating this pollution, Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) along with 40 co-sponsors, proposed a resolution on January 21 to reject this science-based endangerment finding and prevent the EPA from protecting the public's health by curbing global warming. Specifically, the resolution would prevent the agency from requiring that new coal-fired power plants and other large emitters use modern technology to reduce their global warming pollution. In addition, this resolution would stop EPA from doing any research or analysis on climate science in its efforts to implement the endangerment finding. The Senate will likely vote on this binding resolution before the end of June. See Senator Murkowski's floor speech about the resolution in the Related Resources list on the right hand side of this page.

The Clean Air Act is a law with a nearly 40-year track record of cutting dangerous pollution to protect human health and the environment and to spur innovation. This legislation has prevented more than 400,000 premature deaths and hundreds of millions of cases of respiratory and cardiovascular disease. Instead of standing in the way of progress, Congress should move quickly to enact the comprehensive climate and energy legislation the country needs to build a clean energy economy, create jobs, protect the environment, and ensure a healthy future for our families.”

“LMAO!!!”

“SILLY LIBBIE ANSWERS FOR WHEN THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT:

1) You want children to suffer.
2) You don�t believe in science.
3) You�re homophobic.
4) That�s all George Bush�s fault.
5) You want polar bears to die.
6) You�re stupid.
7) You�re crazy.
8) Republicans did it too.
9) Who�s paying you to say that?
10) Nazi!
11) You�re racist.
12) You hate the poor.
13) Blah, blah�.Sarah Palin and her kids�..
14) Stop listening to Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck
15) That�s mean.
16) You�re an extremist.
17) Fascist!
18) The Huffington Post/MSNBC/DailyKos said�..
19) You hate women.
20) You�re in the pocket of Big ________.
21) You hate old people.
22) You want sick people to die.
23) You own guns to compensate for something.
24) You don�t care about the environment.
25) Warmonger!
26) You really need to stop watching Fox News.
27) Redneck!
28) Scumbag!
29) You just hate Obama because he�s black.”

“Your Global warming list should be sent to Santa, good luck with that and Merry X-max.”

“Oh crap - The lizards are in on the scam too!

Global warming blamed for pattern of lizard deaths

By David Brown
Friday, May 14, 2010

When it comes to the hazards of global warming, it may turn out that lizards in burrows are the canaries in the coal mine.

In a study to be published Friday in the journal Science, an international team of biologists reports that in more than one-tenth of the places in Mexico where lizards flourished in 1975, the reptiles now cannot be found. The researchers predict that by 2080, about 40 percent of local lizard populations worldwide will have died off and 20 percent of lizard species will be extinct.

The reason for the huge die-off appears to be rising temperatures. But it isn't heat that is killing the lizards directly.

Instead, global warming appears to be lengthening the period of the day when lizards must seek shelter or risk fatal overheating. In the breeding season, that sheltering period is now so long that females of many species are unable to eat enough food to produce eggs and offspring.

Springs that start earlier and are warmer than they once were have been noted in many regions of the world in the past three decades. The new study suggests that the phenomenon may be far more important for the survival of some animals than peak summer temperatures, said Barry Sinervo, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California at Santa Cruz who headed the 26-person research team.

"It is as if something has really happened in world climate and the lizards are telling us that," he said.

The lizard findings also suggest that early stages of global warming may be more than a warning: They may have permanent consequences.

"Many of us have been worried about extinctions in the future," said Raymond B. Huey, a lizard physiologist at the University of Washington in Seattle, who wrote a commentary accompanying the study. "This paper shows that extinctions are already here. I think that will really be surprising to most biologists."”