North American Union?

“Americans had better start warming up to the idea of the European Union. There already efforts for a North American Union. An excerpt from the article linked to below:

“To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.”
It’s just too tempting. The Canadians have the raw materials. Mexico has the cheap labor. And America has the financial backing to make it all work. The end result is the constitution becoming toilet paper and loss of all sovereignty.

The article:

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965

The full report:

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf”

“LOL. never know. but the COuntry Club Republicans (not the group I was part of by the by) know no dishonor as being too great.”

“the end of the world is near”

“It seems like this is the reason behind the open border policy that Bush and so many in the Senate are embracing. Here is another article about the so called "Amero" to replace the dollar.

"The Plan to Replace the Dollar With the 'Amero'
by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted May 22, 2006


Immigration Bill Is Worse Than You Think

Senators Need to Stop Voting on Stuff About Which They Know Next to Nothing

Our View: No Conservative Could Vote for Senate Immigration Bill

Only Nixon Could Go to China, and Only Pence Could Sell Amnesty to the House

Terrorists Use Any Means Necessary to Cross Border




The idea to form the North American Union as a super-NAFTA knitting together Canada, the United States and Mexico into a super-regional political and economic entity was a key agreement resulting from the March 2005 meeting held at Baylor University in Waco, Tex., between President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin.

A joint statement published by the three presidents following their Baylor University summit announced the formation of an initial entity called, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP). The joint statement termed the SPP a “trilateral partnership” that was aimed at producing a North American security plan as well as providing free market movement of people, capital, and trade across the borders between the three NAFTA partners:

We will establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the secure and efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our borders.

A working agenda was established:

We will establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working parties will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses, and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has produced a SPP website, which documents how the U.S. has implemented the SPP directive into an extensive working agenda.

Following the March 2005 meeting in Waco, Tex., the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published in May 2005 a task force report titled “Building a North American Community.” We have already documented that this CFR task force report calls for a plan to create by 2010 a redefinition of boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries. We have argued that a likely reason President Bush has not secured our border with Mexico is that the administration is pushing for the establishment of the North American Union.

The North American Union is envisioned to create a super-regional political authority that could override the sovereignty of the United States on immigration policy and trade issues. In his June 2005 testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Pastor, the Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University, stated clearly the view that the North American Union would need a super-regional governance board to make sure the United States does not dominate the proposed North American Union once it is formed:

NAFTA has failed to create a partnership because North American governments have not changed the way they deal with one another. Dual bilateralism, driven by U.S. power, continue to govern and irritate. Adding a third party to bilateral disputes vastly increases the chance that rules, not power, will resolve problems.

This trilateral approach should be institutionalized in a new North American Advisory Council. Unlike the sprawling and intrusive European Commission, the Commission or Council should be lean, independent, and advisory, composed of 15 distinguished individuals, 5 from each nation. Its principal purpose should be to prepare a North American agenda for leaders to consider at biannual summits and to monitor the implementation of the resulting agreements.

Pastor was a vice chairman of the CFR task force that produced the report “Building a North American Union.”

Pastor also proposed the creation of a Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment with the view that “a permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.” The intent is for this North American Union Tribunal would have supremacy over the U.S. Supreme Court on issues affecting the North American Union, to prevent U.S. power from “irritating” and retarding the progress of uniting Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. into a new 21st century super-regional governing body.

Robert Pastor also advises the creation of a North American Parliamentary Group to make sure the U.S. Congress does not impede progress in the envisioned North American Union. He has also called for the creation of a North American Customs and Immigration Service which would have authority over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security.

Pastor’s 2001 book “Toward a North American Community” called for the creation of a North American Union that would perfect the defects Pastor believes limit the progress of the European Union. Much of Pastor’s thinking appears aimed at limiting the power and sovereignty of the United States as we enter this new super-regional entity. Pastor has also called for the creation of a new currency which he has coined the “Amero,” a currency that is proposed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican peso.

If President Bush had run openly in 2004 on the proposition that a prime objective of his second term was to form the North American Union and to supplant the dollar with the “Amero,” we doubt very much that President Bush would have carried Ohio, let alone half of the Red State majority he needed to win re-election. Pursuing any plan that would legalize the conservatively estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the United States could well spell election disaster for the Republican Party in 2006, especially for the House of Representative where every seat is up for grabs."”

“BE AFRAID!!!
GAY AGENDA, TERORISTS, IMMIGRANTS, AMERICAN UNION!!!

DON'T LOSE THAT FEAR RIGHT BEFORE THE 2006 ELECTIONS!!!!”

“so il hiker thinks we should embrace homosexuals”

“WWJH?

Who Would Jesus Hate Sarge?

I'm so out of touch. How dare me think gay people should have rights.

Burn 'em at the stake!”

“1Ti 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.

1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

Down with the gays and a big ol' cup of shut the eff up for the women!”

“No one thought the Berlin Wall would come down either or that the USSR would fall either. I’m not trying to propagate paranoia just throwing things out there for discussion. Stick your head in the sand if you like. It’d be a far cry better than having it up your ass.”

“This is the beginning...next you will see Hastert, Taliban Lindsay Graham and Mexico City John McCain calling for inclusion of the new UN tax on the wealthy....LOL...by world standards even our POOR will be rich. That will be a hoot when Yolanda in the projects gets a bill from the UN for FREE MONEY for the kids in UGMUKISTAN who are training to be terrorists.”

“Down with the gays and a big ol' cup of shut the eff up for the women! - so il hiker

You said WWJH? I showed you you were wrong. Instead of admitting it, you then try to put down the Bible itself. Getting a little off topic there so il hiker?”

“CNN has picked up on this story.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ensmPJm5B5A&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fgroups%2Emyspace%2Ecom%2Findex%2Ecfm%3Ffuseaction%3Dgroups%2EgroupProfile%26groupid%3D103197910%26Mytoken%3D11C217F3%2D6ACB%2D10DE%2D19”

“I thought we should have invaded Canaduh years ago.

All that open space and a few dudes on horseback guarding it = easy pickins.”

“Image the american eagle with a hockey helmit and huaraches on. That will be a reality if some groups aren't stopped.”

““I thought we should have invaded Canaduh years ago.

All that open space and a few dudes on horseback guarding it = easy pickins.”
violiN
11:05:30 AM
6/22/06

We already did, twice. It didn't go very well for us.”

“Yea, remember 54.40 or fight? We didn't fight we settled for 49th parallel.”

“LOL...when Pedro and a few thousand Wetbacks hit you up becuase you have 2 cars, or 2 bicycles....(remembering that the POOR of America are light years above anyone else) or 2 TVs....wonder how long you die hard socialists will remain.”

“Much of resistance to imy reform is caused by the possibility of a union.”

“That may be so.....but i find it strange that the Unions are opposed to Invasion Reform. I would think they would be the first in line...in fact the biggest opponent used to be Cesar Chavez ( I think the farm worker unionizer) but the unions explained that Invasion was a PRO LIB thing (i.e. get more victims) and he had to shut up”

“The IMvasion is from the far left a humanitarian concern ,but the main impetus comes from the business bunch which spans party lines.”