Frogmarch?

“THURSDAY, Aug. 31, 2006, 2:16 p.m.
By Mike Johnson

Dem Ex-candidate Charged with Election Fraud

Donovan Riley, who dropped out of the race for a state Senate seat after allegations arose that he voted twice in the same election in 2000, was charged today by Waukesha County District Attorney Paul Bucher with voter fraud.

Riley is scheduled to make his initial appearance in Waukesha County Circuit Court on Sept. 11 a single count of felony election fraud-voting more than once.

Riley was running for the seat held by incumbent Democratic Sen. Jeff Plale of South Milwaukee and was to face Plale in the Sept. 12 primary election.

All Children Matter, a pro-school-choice group, filed a complaint with the Wisconsin Elections Board claiming that Riley voted both in Wisconsin and in Illinois in the 2000 election.

Bucher issued the charge after reviewing voting records from Cook County, Ill.

In mid-August, Riley had issued a written statement that in 2000 he was dividing his time between Illinois and Wisconsin and "it's possible I made a mistake."

Riley was living in Oconomowoc in 2000, but moved to the Bay View neighborhood of Milwaukee late last year.

http://www.jsonline.com/watch/?watch=1&date=8/31/2006&id=10750”

“The elation oozing from the left about the Obama Administration s decision to try Khalid Sheik Mohammad in a civilian court, where he will not be tried as a war criminal but will be given constitutional rights, is in stark contrast to the rabid liberal lynch mob that demanded George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Karl Rove should have been "frogmarched" to the gallows and hung for war crimes. Simply a bottomless pit of hypocrisy.”

“the idiots that wanted the bush admin tried for war crimes were indeed idiots, but since the 9-11 attackers were civilians who attacked civilians, it makes sense to me that khalid is tried in a civilian court. now, if you happen to know of some kind of legal reason he shouldnt be, i would love to hear it”

“an army that does not hand out graduation certificates is under a different set of laws. interesting philosophy!”

“The These guys won t get a fair trial thread is for your misdirection, cb.

This thread is about liberals and their hypocrisy.

Please stick to the subject.”

“so, you guys have nothing but sarcasm and whining. as i thought”

“i am very open to the possibility that there may be a legal basis to having a military trial, that you guys may be right, but so far it has just been a continuation of the left-wing witch hunt that you guys have been on for the last half decade”

“i am not on a witch hunt - i dont know who decides the trial specifics

i do believe that these cowards were in an army and therefore not civilians”

“A gang like Democrats, Crips and Bloods, Hells Angels, Dallas Cowboys, SEIU, NRA, SCOTUS or Sierra Club -- not a~n army.”

“you are right, they are in a "gang" /rolls eyes”

“Stupie plagarized that line so I guess I can't hold him responsible for it.

I'm having a hard time remembering when anyone on the left wanted members of the Bush misadministration hung without a trial.

If you can't even post an original thought, at least copy one based in reality.”

“*snicker*
Obamy s bum is calling you, vile.”

““you are right, they are in a "gang" /rolls eyes”

How does one determine what is or is not an army? Would they need a secret handshake or a common badge?”

“another way to ask it:

Is a group of 1,000s of men, financially supported by 1 or more governments, who orchestrate attacks against a country, an Army?

I think you would have to be a complete fool to say "no".”

“Does a corporate thousand pass as an army then.

Also, a third trial by Congress could be an option as was used against Corporate crooks that effected way more than 3,000 american citizens with their actions.”

“War crimes=act of war=declaration by Congress=has yet to happen.”

“rosey, so if a country were to attack another country, it's not an act of war until the one that is attacked declares war back?”

“salebored, look over here declarations don't detract from the truthfulness of my statement”

“an "act of war" is one thing but war must be legally "declared" for anything to fall under the guide of "war crimes" and any subsequent prosecution as such, as you are advocating.”

“So, `Black Water` is an army? (what once was Black Water)Does your mouse pay BW?
last edited: 11/19/09 8:47:24 AM”

“Rosey should have gone into LAW instead of cooking school.”

“Still reeling from being called out on yesterdays lie, Stove?”

“So, `Black Water` is an army?

Black Water, and the collective of all armed forces doing the fighting oversees are/were in fact, an army.”

“With the small exception that Blackwater had/has absolutely no accountability under U.S. armed forces law.”

“whatever ... still an Army”

“An army being trained in our own schools as an extension of the half day airliners rentals program.”

“so we agree it is an army. great.”

“so, is your position that he should be tried in a military court?”

“no, i haven't considered which court he should be tried in. what do you think?”

“im leaning towards civilian. but im interested in hearing opposing arguments (as opposed to opposing bickering and opposing mallard fillmore cartoons)”

“I wonder how they are going to pick a jury. No one in the U.S. is unfamiliar with 9-11.”

“let alone a jury of his peers”

“peers doesn't mean friends - just that they are on the same level, or in this context, not government officials - just regular people”

“who live in a foreign country”

“i know what it means. i was just clowning”

“Were/are these (alleged) conspirators citizens or immigrants?”

“So, select ignorance is a virtue while peering from the jury box?”

“Were/are these (alleged) conspirators citizens or immigrants?�

what does that have to do with whether or not they should get a military trial?”

“I`m not sure it has anything to do with it, however I am personally more inclined to think a civilian court is fine if they are citizens of the US and a military court if they are foreign nationals attacking US citizens. Whether or not a non-citizen should be afforded America`s due process is debatable IMO.
Having said that, I don`t know that there`s any right answer here. Let`s consider the case of the Fort Hood shooter: he`s a citizen of the US but will probably get a military trial. Hell, for all I know he`ll get both.”

“so, basically, none of us really know jackshlt. you dont, i dont, hpd and stovie dont. it has already been decided. so, lets move on, shall we?”

“Um, that`s not what we do here. Can`t you see all the horse carcasses?”

“oh, yea. i forgot where i was. sorry”

“One of my best friends went to med school with the fort hood shooter and said he almost failed out and stood out as a goober. just saying.”

“your friend or the shooter?”

““so, basically, none of us really know jackshlt. you dont, i dont, hpd and stovie dont. it has already been decided. so, lets move on, shall we?”
crash bang
7:40:41 PM
11/19/09

Where was this sentiment during the Bush presidency? "Well Bush already decided so lets move on" wasn't a phrase heard around these parts very often.”

“in before "why didnt you say it about bush"


oh too late. damn”

“Your smarmy comment doesn't invalidate my question.”

“so, what, im supposed to answer for everyone on this board? am i the voice of the left?”

“no, I just wanted to use the word smarmy”