Clinton Appointed Judge Declares Boating Illegal

“jmitch
11:57:45 AM
9/16/06
ignore this user
Wow! logic.”

“You Clinton apologists are so easy. ;-)”

“SS-

Just in case you conveniently overlooked a prior post, I agreed with you it was a poor decision.

Damn, I even suck at being an apologist!

Oh, maybe you were calling salebored an apologist? Did salebored put me on ignore? I suddenly feel very confused.”

“In addition, the judge held that federal law grants exclusive and private control over the waters of the river, outside the main shipping channel, to riparian landowners. The shallows of the navigable waters are no longer open to the public, the MRAA reports,

Private property rights over public good. A judge backs up arrests by a Southern Sheriff acting on a complaint from land owners. Sounds more conservative than liberal.

I can't swear that I understand the decision, but I think some new legislation is in order - or maybe just a clearer ruling.

http://www.louisianasportsman.com/details.php?id=213
last edited: 9/16/06 1:09:29 PM”

“LOL
jmitch, I still trolling, dude. ;-)
(This is a Fuego thread)”

“Stove - you are such a friggin socialist it's pathetic.”

“Private Property hating commie is what you are.”

“[VBG]
Yeah pedx, read what my compassionate conservatism got me in the No Good Deed Goes Unpunished thread. ;-)
last edited: 9/16/06 1:46:29 PM”

“pedxing - that's some non-passive aggressive behavior there boy”

“You have to admit, though, that it's funny that StoveStomper has suddenly turned into an advocate for the public good against property rights.

Them are strange lemons.”

“Independent Judiciary. Damn Jmitch, I salute you. I wasted three paragraphs to say the same thing. No sarcasm here, I'm dead serious. Welcome to the Separation of Powers.”

“LOL...I wonder if we are ever going to get the whole "separation of powers thing" working. The best thing is when the courts start legislating is to have the executive branch NOT enforce the Court decision...NEVER happen? ask the Cherokees.”

“Judicial restraint will occur when a few senators begin IMPEACHING Judges...(LOL) see old Ruth Bader sitting there trying to explain how she can Constitutionally justify using International law to enforce US Constitutional law....You burn a couple (lose job, pension, law license) the rest will start reading the law instead of creating it.”

“How many congressmen own boats?......”

“Any one remember the Monkey Business?”

“LOL...I wonder if we are ever going to get the whole "separation of powers thing" working. The best thing is when the courts start legislating is to have the executive branch NOT enforce the Court decision...NEVER happen? ask the Cherokees.

lol i say we give all of our power to one man! and let him disobey whatever laws he feels fit! man, i sure love freedom.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws/
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1149361,00.html”

“How many boating companies own congressmen?”

“Mjw...we did give the power to one man who decided to obey and disobey what he wanted...I mean when you can commit rape and sexual assault as you see fit...what is a Clinton to do?”

“Hey now, lets stay on topic here. The judge is the one who issued the ruling. I see no connection between that and Clinton or bush pretty much ignoring the law. Maybe it's just me.”

“kleetn that was a couple of days ago...but what the heck...AVAST YE!”